SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Just the Facts, Ma'am: A Compendium of Liberal Fiction -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Selectric II who wrote (26633)1/14/2005 6:01:42 PM
From: Orcastraiter  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 90947
 
"This is about imminent threat."
• White House spokesman Scott McClellan, 2/10/03

What part of imminent don't you understand?



To: Selectric II who wrote (26633)1/14/2005 6:04:32 PM
From: Orcastraiter  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 90947
 
And yes...grave threat, gathering threat mean imminent threat. If there's a storm gathering it means imminent storm.

"This is about imminent threat."
• White House spokesman Scott McClellan, 2/10/03

What part of imminent don't you understand?

Orca



To: Selectric II who wrote (26633)1/14/2005 7:00:52 PM
From: sea_biscuit  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 90947
 
This is stupid. We have lost 1400+ soldiers, got 10,000+ of them wounded and spent 2 years and $200 Billion on it and you are arguing semantics!

Btw, Scott Mclellan stated that it was an "imminent threat" as well. And Cheney had "no doubt" that Saddam had WMDs. What does "no doubt" mean in your interpretation?


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News