Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Moderate Forum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Michelino who wrote (15297)	1/15/2005 3:41:54 AM
From: Raymond Duray	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 20773

Michelino, I admire your intellectual curiosity. I respect your honesty. And I notice that you are not as far along the "path of 9/11 enlightenment" as I am. To wit, you say: "How do you get it to implode and not fall outward?" They said, "Oh, it's really how you time and place the explosives." I always accepted that answer, until the World Trade Center, when I thought about it myself. And that's not the correct answer. The correct answer is, there's no other way for them to go but down. Ah, so. And such was the case with the implosion of WTC 7 at 5:20 PM ET, 9/11/01. There we are in complete agreement. With the exception of some minor dusting of the neighborhood, the demolition of WTC 7 was a standard controlled-demolition operation. And even that amount of dust was actually more or less the expected result of controlled charges setting off key steel connections in steel framed buildings. The real Hollywood spectaculars were the explosions that forced tens of thousands of tons of alkaline dust ejecta flying at great velocity and in complete disregard for gravity mushrooming away from the Twin Towers. Take a look: digitaljournalist.org I'm sorry, but only the lamest of observers would call that ejecta a gravitational effect. Sorry to call you a numbskull, but I do respectfully request that you stop reading the official story long enough to TRUST YOUR OWN EYES! What you see here is not the result of gravity, it is the result of a sequentially timed demolition: 911research.wtc7.net Notice the fact that the huge blowout below the main plume occurs on the mechanical level? Many of us have. Are you aware that on September 7, 2001 bomb sniffing dogs were taken off patrol in the South Tower for the first time since 1993? Are you aware that at some point in time between September 7 and September 10 that the South Tower was made inaccessible to tenants due to a power outage required for a "telecommunications upgrade"? Are you aware that all modern telecommunications networks are constructed of fiber optics and that electrical systems are irrelevant to their route installation? Michelino, you are getting better at understanding what it is you are looking at. I suggest you simply spend more time. Because the more you apply your intellect, the more you will come to realize that 9/11 was one of the most elaborate false flag operations ever perpetrated. You do know what a "false flag" operation is, right? -R.