SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: SilentZ who wrote (214994)1/15/2005 4:02:57 PM
From: RetiredNow  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1573994
 
OK. My idea for social security IS a mix of socialism and captialism. I'm not proposing we move to a 401(k) style personal account plan. Instead, I'd like to see social security continue to be untouchable by the beneficiaries until the retirement age mandated by Congress. However, we can be one hell of alot smarter about how we invest the participants money. Like I keep mentioning, let's put all the contributions into accounts tagged to each contributors social security number. Second, let's invest their money in target-date/horizon funds so they can maximize their return.

That is all I would want. That would ensure that everyone still has a safety net. It would also ensure that everyone gets a good return. That's the best of both worlds. Instead, we have the worst of both worlds. We have a system that needs constant upward revisions in tax rates and decreases in benefits. And we have a system that our youth believes won't be around to help them in their old age.



To: SilentZ who wrote (214994)1/15/2005 4:57:13 PM
From: tejek  Respond to of 1573994
 
There's no reason why a government has to be EITHER socialist OR capitalist. I'd imagine the perfect government would be the ideal mix of both ideologies.

Exactly.........but even countries like Sweden which mesh the two isms successfully are seen as unacceptable by most Americans.

ted