SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: mishedlo who wrote (21499)1/17/2005 8:44:45 AM
From: russwinter  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 116555
 
BCA Research on the high yield overshoot:
bcaresearch.com

This quote from the article you posted is stunning and says it all, confirmation of my Portland "Pearl District theory" too:

About 30 percent of condominium buyers in Washington and San Francisco and 40 percent in south Florida are obtaining mortgages for investment purposes, says Gregory Leisch, chief executive of Delta Associates, a real-estate research firm.

We will get another look at the purchase index on Wed., but the big story on the buying spree rollover in housing will come in after Super Bowl Sunday on Feb. 6th, when "homebuyers" tend to get active. We shall see if the FOMC rate hike and possible language change meets them with another good uptick in mortgage rates, or if that even matters. Will be crucial in determining if air is coming out of the Bubble, ya think? Looks like the consumer is being subsidized still, so how are lenders making money, margins are disappearing fast?

Do you realize that fed fund rates have been increased from 1.5% in early August to going on 2.5% on Feb. 2nd, and ARM rates (using the MBAA figure) have only gone up from 3.85-3.90 to 4.10-4.17. It's been a combination of foreign central banks heavily buying agencies and shrinking spreads (especially of late), and lending resell and portfolio margins shrinking. Hidden away in a 10-Q of Homestead Mortgage is this boilerplate remark:

On June 30, 2004, in response to current growth prospects for the United States economy, the Federal Reserve Open Market Committee (the "Federal Reserve") raised the Federal Funds Rate 25 basis points in the first of a series of expected moves to increase short-term interest rates. Higher short-term interest rates will increase the Company's borrowing costs, thereby reducing financing spreads (the difference between the yields earned on these investments and the rates charged on related borrowings). Although the effects of rising borrowing costs on financing spreads can eventually be mitigated by ARM security yield increases, interest rates on the Company's borrowings rise (and fall) almost immediately while ARM security yields change slowly by comparison because the coupon interest rates on the underlying loans reset only once or twice a year and the amount of each reset can be limited or capped. Consequently, as increasing short-term interest rates reduce current financing spreads, earnings and dividends will decline in the immediately ensuing quarters before the benefits of ARM security yield increases are fully realized.

It's just amazing how such extraordinary efforts are employed to avoid Judgement Day, whether it's hiring tankers at $10 a barrel for emergency oil shipments, to convincing the BOJ to buy agencies at only 30-35 bps spreads over Treasuries during a FNM crisis. The pendulum on this Emperor wears no clothes nonsense, whether it be non-existent junk and agency spreads to running refineries at max capacity and dangerously injecting water into oil fields to squeeze out a few 100,000 extra bb a day, has just gone way too far, something is going to break.



To: mishedlo who wrote (21499)1/17/2005 9:52:00 AM
From: Haim R. Branisteanu  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 116555
 
Is a Home-Price Decline Crossing the Atlantic?: John Wasik
Jan. 17 (Bloomberg) -- A recent decline in U.K. home prices may be a harbinger for still-hot markets in the U.S.

What's more important than the possible spreading of this trend is how it's developing, a pattern worth watching closely if you are investing in any torrid residential market.

The U.K. slowdown is marked by a drop in mortgage approvals, which dipped to a four-year low in November of last year, according to the British Banker's Association. Mortgage applications declined because interest rates rose and home values eroded. The synergy of both events likely has quelled housing purchase demand.

``There is little to suggest that mortgage applications will change in the near term, given the noticeable slowdown in the housing market,'' stated David Dooks, director of statistics at the banker's association.

While U.S. Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan and most U.S. real estate industry groups deny the existence of a housing bubble, there's evidence that some markets are overheated.

Bubble-Prone Areas

A Jan. 12 report by Michael Youngblood, managing director of asset-backed securities research for the investment banker and broker Friedman, Billings and Ramsey, identified bubbles in 27 U.S. cities covering almost 20 percent of the U.S. population using third-quarter figures from last year.

The bubble-prone metropolitan areas included Boston, New York, Los Angeles, San Francisco, San Diego and Riverside, California. In Youngblood's study, 20 of the likely bubbles were in California.

Youngblood defines bubbles by measuring the ratio of median home prices to per capita income in each city, then taking the top 5 percent of those ratios.

``We do not expect the house-price bubble to burst in any city until economic activity has contracted for a minimum of four quarters,'' Youngblood stated. ``The economic expansion under way generally and individually in the 27 cities that are experiencing bubbles postpones the deflation of home prices.''

Overheated markets often recede when investors en masse sense that returns won't be effortless or automatic. Higher financing costs typically damp demand and cool housing values. While it's too soon to say if a bubble is bursting -- bringing about 20 percent price declines or more -- it's worth watching.

U.K. Decline

In the U.K., for example, home prices fell in December 2004 for the second time in three months, according to the Nationwide Building Society, a major mortgage lender. Five interest-rate increases, spurred by the Bank of England's efforts to chill the market, likely spurred the decline.

Will the feverish U.S. market, which may see mortgage-rate jumps due to continued Federal Reserve Bank rate increases and inflation, follow the British trend?

New home sales fell 12 percent in November 2004, according to the U.S. Commerce Department, the biggest decline in more than a decade. While existing home sales rose 2.7 percent in the month, mortgage applications fell in the week ending Jan. 7, after dropping 10.6 percent in the prior week, reports the Mortgage Bankers Association of America.

Another way of gauging home-price movements is to measure the risk of large declines in specific markets. In other words, high local volatility may telegraph a greater likelihood of a housing dip.

Measuring Volatility

Francis Parisi and Scott Mason of Standard & Poor's, the financial research company, have developed a housing volatility index that tracks several major U.S. markets. They examine current home prices and mortgage rates to see where residential markets may be headed.

The markets that Parisi and Mason predict will ``likely to suffer declines over the next two to three years in the event of an economic downturn'' based on U.S. housing data through the second quarter are a who's who list of sizzling U.S. markets: Los Angeles, San Luis Obispo, Orange County, Santa Rosa and Ventura, California; Brockton, Barnstable, and New Bedford, Massachusetts.; Fort Pierce and Miami, Florida; Nassau-Suffolk, New York; and Monmouth-Ocean and Jersey City, New Jersey.

If home prices plunge in any market, there will be widespread reverberations.

The Fallout

Due to the wealth effect, a stagnant or falling housing market may signal to consumers to curtail spending. When consumers feel flush -- and their home prices give them sweat- free appreciation -- they tend to spend more in the larger economy, including buying more real estate. Should the trend reverse, it would curb spending.

Abiding by that theory, a large retrenchment in home prices would also hobble national economies. A July 2004 Goldman Sachs report on housing prices in the second quarter of that year titled ``House Prices: A Threat to Global Economy or Part of the Necessary Rebalancing?'' gave some estimates of what a housing price pullback would mean.

``If prices overshoot (are overvalued) in line with past experience and (mortgage) rates rise by 1 percentage point, the total impact (decline) on consumption in the U.S., U.K. and Australia would be 2.4 percent, 1.9 percent and 3.1 percent respectively,'' the report summarized.

Word of Caution

It's notoriously difficult to predict when any housing market will turn. If you're investing now, it will help to have a long-term focus of more than five years.

For short-term investors, it would be useful to watch consumer spending and income figures in tandem with mortgage applications, paying special attention to sharp drops in personal income and job growth.

Other local indicators of a slowdown are properties staying on the market for several months and sellers not getting their asking prices.

The conventional wisdom tends to focus on mortgage rates and home sales, though the psychology of the market may be a more important indicator.

Unfortunately there's no reliable index for mass home buying mood swings. For that, you'll have to keep an eye on selling conditions in specific areas. While non-U.S. residential trends may be significant, like politics, all real estate is still a local matter.

To contact the writer of this column:
John F. Wasik in Chicago at jwasik@bloomberg.net.

To contact the editor of this column:
Bill Ahearn at bahearn@bloomberg.net.
Last Updated: January 17, 2005 00:07 EST