SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Anthony @ Equity Investigations, Dear Anthony, -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Janice Shell who wrote (89409)1/16/2005 11:32:04 PM
From: Buckey  Respond to of 122087
 
it is definitely enteertaining



To: Janice Shell who wrote (89409)1/17/2005 10:27:16 AM
From: StockDung  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 122087
 
.REGISTERED SEX OFFENDER JOINS TOM HEYSEK AND A LONG LINE OF FRAUDULENT PROMOTERS IN PENNY STOCK ABSOLUTE HEALTH AND FITNESS STOCKFRAUD PROMOTION.

=======================================================

"Last week in this space we looked at a bungled SEC effort to take on a gang of penny stock pump-and-dumpers behind a North Carolina outfit named Absolute Health and Fitness Inc., which claimed to own a regional network of fitness clubs."

"Now, at least one of the players in that affair has surfaced in the stun gun bubble. He is a Casselberry, Fla. ex-con and registered sex offender named Orville Baldridge, who served as the promotional muscle behind Absolute Health and Fitness Inc. at the turn of the decade. Baldridge has now reappeared as the oomph behind the shell for a penny stock outfit called Law Enforcement Associates Corp. (LENF), whose stock price had soared 1,693% since last autumn on stun gun hype from a group of paid stock promoters in Vancouver."

nypost.com

STUN SHARES HYPE
By CHRISTOPHER BYRON
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Email Archives
Print Reprint

January 17, 2005 -- Two weeks ago, stock in a stun gun company was widely viewed on Wall Street as the hottest ticket in town, with just a handful of previously unknown penny stock outfits soaring on the shirttails of Nasdaq-listed Taser International Inc., to a combined market value of more than $1 billion.
Yet by the end of last week the gig seemed to be up, with pink sheets high-flyer Stinger Systems Inc. leading the way down with a one-day drop of more than 40%. Through it all, one could hear again that familiar tell-tale sound of hype, hope and hot air wheezing from yet another penny stock soufflé gone flat.

It's a sound that investors are hearing more and more these days as the growing workload of legislation like the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and the Patriot Act has caused the Securities and Exchange Commission to increasingly ignore regulation of the penny stock market. Result: a spreading plague of financial world squeegeemen in the gutters and alleyways of Wall Street.

Last week in this space we looked at a bungled SEC effort to take on a gang of penny stock pump-and-dumpers behind a North Carolina outfit named Absolute Health and Fitness Inc., which claimed to own a regional network of fitness clubs.

Now, at least one of the players in that affair has surfaced in the stun gun bubble. He is a Casselberry, Fla. ex-con and registered sex offender named Orville Baldridge, who served as the promotional muscle behind Absolute Health and Fitness Inc. at the turn of the decade. Baldridge has now reappeared as the oomph behind the shell for a penny stock outfit called Law Enforcement Associates Corp. (LENF), whose stock price had soared 1,693% since last autumn on stun gun hype from a group of paid stock promoters in Vancouver.

LENF's SEC filings are a hodgepodge of incomplete and conflicting information. In one bizarre case, the filings indicate that nearly 22 million shares of stock in the LENF shell — known as Academy Resources — were issued by a boat moving company that had no apparent power to issue them in the first place.

According to the filings, LENF began life in May of 1998 as a Ne vada penny stock shell called Academy Resources, Inc., with 5.45 million shares outstanding. Management consisted of a one-person board of directors, with the seat being occupied by a man named Nolan Moss.

The filings don't provide any additional details about Moss, but if the SEC had wanted to check him out, they would have found Moss to be a Vancouver-based penny stock crook who had already been fined $30,000 by Canadian regulators in a separate stock-rigging scheme.

Want more? Well, an exhibit to one of the SEC filings shows that in June of 2000, a mysterious Nevada outfit called "Academy Yacht Deliveries Corporation" popped up out of nowhere and purported to issue 21.8 million shares of "Academy" stock to acquire a Delaware-incorporated "development stage company" called Myofis Internet Inc.

Nor does this mishmash of alleged facts explain why a company identified only as "Carcinotek Internet, Inc." would surface as well in the deal as a joint signator alongside Myofis.

In fact, the appearance of Carcinotek simply underscores the duplicitous and ragged way LENF seems to have been run from the moment of its birth — as a toy for penny-stock promoters whose handshakes are often worthless and whose contracts get signed in disappearing ink.

In reality, Pasadena-based Carcinotek was not an Internet company at all, but an Armenian-controlled cancer research outfit that got shoehorned into the June 2000 merger of Myofis and the Academy shell in the apparent belief that the Armenian bunch would agree to become what amounted to financial tinsel in the deal.

Not surprisingly, the Armenians failed to play ball, leaving what had plainly been set up as the first step in a penny stock promotional hustle to go forward with not even a hint of a reason why the owners of the Academy shell would give away 80% of the shell's stock acquire an "Internet" business having no value at all.

In any event, once the merger was consummated in June of 2000, Nolan Moss surrendered his seat on Academy's one-person board to a fellow named Guy Cohen as Myofis's designated hitter.

Documents filed with the SEC in July of 2002 try to gloss over this entire period, stating only vaguely that by the end of 2000 the Myofis Internet project hadn't gotten off the ground so the investment was "written off."

Really? Archived Web pages obtained from a data collection research project involving the Library of Congress and the National Science Foundation show that a Web site called Myofis.com in fact went live literally days after the company claims it was shut down. What's more, by May 2001 the site had morphed into a promotional vehicle for penny stocks, called Streamingnews.net, with the Web site being registered to one Guy Cohen, who promptly began using it to pump LENF's share price.

In January 2002, Academy Resources merged with Law Enforcement Associates Corp., a privately-held North Carolina maker of various sorts of policing equipment and espionage gear.

To acquire the family-owned business, which had been run by a North Carolina State Senator named John Carrington, the shell's owners issued 10 million more shares of stock in the shell, complete with a befuddling and selectively applied one-for-three reverse stock-split designed to whittle down the holdings of the Myofis bunch while leaving Carrington himself untouched.

So, who is John Carrington? Over the years, North Carolina newspapers have reported on sales of paramilitary equipment by his company to oppressive foreign regimes such as those of prewar Iraq and Apartheid-era South Africa.

And just this last April, LENF was raided by federal agents seeking evidence to explain how equipment manufactured by the firm had wound up illegally in China. Yet the company has so far not issued a Form 8K to report this matter to the general public and no one at the SEC seems to have asked that it be done either.

LENF's newest cheerleader is a Vancouver-based stock promoter named Dawn Van Zant, who waves her pom-poms tirelessly on behalf of LENF and her other clients via more than three dozen different penny-stock pumping Web sites she owns and operates.

And looming in the distance behind all of these characters are the shadowy outlines of the penny stock world's Mister Bigs, who are a story for another day. But if the SEC lacks the manpower — or the moxie — to rid Wall Street of its squeegeemen and penny stock graffiti, why bother pointing out even bigger battles after that?

The penny stock market is a Wall Street alleyway that simply must be hosed down, and so far no one's doing nuttin'. Your tax dollars? Go figure.

cbyron@nypost.com



To: Janice Shell who wrote (89409)1/17/2005 9:33:37 PM
From: scion  Respond to of 122087
 
A. ``Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus''

In this proposed rulemaking, FinCEN proposes to impose the fifth
special measure (31 U.S.C. 5318A(b)(5)) against First Merchant Bank OSH
Ltd (First Merchant Bank or the Bank). The fifth special measure
prohibits or imposes conditions upon the opening or maintaining of
correspondent or payable-through accounts for the foreign financial
institution of primary money laundering concern. This special measure
may be imposed only through the issuance of a regulation.
Cyprus was divided in 1974 when a coup d'etat directed from Greece
induced the Turkish military to intervene. Since then, the southern
part of the country has been under the control of the Government of the
Republic of Cyprus. The northern part is controlled by a Turkish
Cypriot administration that in 1983 proclaimed itself the ``Turkish
Republic of Northern Cyprus'' (``TRNC'').\4\ Turkey is the only country
that recognizes the ``TRNC.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\4\ Because the United States does not recognize the ``Turkish
Republic of Northern Cyprus,'' all references to the country or
government in this proposed rulemaking are placed within quotation
marks.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

The ``TRNC'' has a sizeable offshore sector that is not subject to
effective anti-money laundering regulation. The offshore sector
consists of 33 banks and approximately 54 international business
companies. Under Turkish Cypriot law, the offshore banks may not
conduct business with ``TRNC'' residents and may not deal in cash. The
offshore entities are audited by the Turkish Cypriot ``Central Bank''
and are required to submit a yearly report on their activities.
However, the ``Central Bank'' has no regulatory authority over the
offshore banks and can neither grant nor revoke licenses. Instead, the
Turkish Cypriot ``Ministry of the Interior'' performs this function,
which leaves the process open to politicization and possible
corruption. Although a recently proposed law would have restricted the
granting of new bank licenses to only those banks already having
licensees in an OECD country, the law never passed.
The Turkish Cypriot anti-money laundering law became effective in
1999. Although the law, on paper, is a significant improvement over the
money laundering controls previously in place, the Government of the
``TRNC'' has received few suspicious activity reports from financial
institutions and has been lax in enforcing the law.\5\ The fact that
the ``TRNC'' is recognized only by Turkey prevents ``TRNC'' officials
from receiving training or funding from international organizations
with experience in combating money laundering.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\5\ See U.S. Department of State, 2003 International Narcotics
Control Strategy Report, issued March 1, 2004 (INCSR).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

There continues to be evidence that narcotics trade with Turkey and
Britain and money laundering are conducted in or through the ``TRNC.''
\6\ Criminals reportedly use casinos operating in the

[[Page 51981]]

``TRNC'' and Turkish Cypriot banks licensed to operate offshore to
launder money from their illegal activities. The jurisdiction's 21
primarily Turkish-mainland owned casinos are essentially unregulated.
``TRNC'' officials believe that much of the currency generated by these
casinos is transported directly to Turkey without entering the ``TRNC''
banking system.\7\ And, as noted above, the licensing process and
supervision of offshore banks by the Government of the ``TRNC'' is not
rigorous. Although Turkish Cypriot law prohibits individuals entering
or leaving the ``TRNC'' from transporting more than the equivalent of
$10,000 in currency, Central Bank officials note that this law is
difficult to enforce, given the large volume of travelers between
Turkey and the ``TRNC'' and the growing number of individuals crossing
the U.N.-patrolled buffer zone since travel restrictions were relaxed
between north and south Cyprus in 2003.\8---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\6\ INCSR, supra note 11.
\7\ Id.
\8\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. First Merchant Bank OSH Ltd

First Merchant Bank operates out of offices in Lefkosa/Nicosia,
``TRNC,'' and has 21 employees. First Merchant Bank was licensed in the
``TRNC'' in 1993 as an offshore bank. It is a privately owned
commercial bank specializing in the provision of commercial and
investment banking services to individual and corporate offshore
customers. On its Web site, the Bank repeatedly advertises the
``private'' and ``discreet'' nature of its services, stressing that
customers receive the ``highest confidentiality'' from and ``a close
relationship'' with the Bank.\9\ First Merchant Bank maintains
correspondent accounts with banks in countries all over the world,
including several U.S. and foreign banks located in New York City.\10\
According to published reports, Dr. Hakki Yaman Namli is President,
Chairman, and General Manager of First Merchant Bank.\11\ First
Merchant Bank is owned by Standard Finance Ltd. (Ireland) and private
shareholders (98% and 2%, respectively).\12\ Standard Finance Ltd., in
turn, is owned by Provincial & Allied Funding Corp. (Bahamas) and
Millvale Holdings Inc. (British Virgin Islands). As stated on its Web
site, First Merchant Bank has four wholly owned subsidiaries: FMB
Finance Ltd (British Virgin Islands), First Merchant International Inc
(Bahamas), First Merchant Finance Ltd (Ireland), and First Merchant
Trust Ltd (Ireland). For the purposes of this document, unless the
context dictates otherwise, references to First Merchant Bank include
FMB Finance Ltd, First Merchant International Inc, First Merchant
Finance Ltd, and First Merchant Trust Ltd, and any other branch,
office, or subsidiary of First Merchant Bank operating in the ``TRNC''
or in any other jurisdiction.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\9\ See firstmerchantbank.com.

edocket.access.gpo.gov



To: Janice Shell who wrote (89409)1/17/2005 9:45:53 PM
From: scion  Respond to of 122087
 
Inside the secret and violent world of Gaston Glock, maker of the most popular firearm in U.S. law enforcement.

network54.com

He is the man behind the gun. You don't mess with Gaston Glock.
His most trusted associate allegedly tried. Lured into a dimly lit garage in Luxembourg by his colleague Charles Ewert, the Austrian Glock stopped to look at a sports car at Ewert's suggestion. Suddenly, a massive masked man leaped from behind and smashed a rubber mallet into Glock's skull. Ewert fled to the stairwell. "I am a coward," he later told Forbes. With Glock off balance, the attacker landed another crushing blow. "I was fighting for my life," recalls Glock, 73, during a rare interview with the press.

Springing up on legs toned by miles of daily swimming, Glock thrust his enormous fist into his assailant's eye socket. As the would-be assassin staggered, Glock pounded again, knocking out a few of the man's teeth. The bloodied attacker staggered, then collapsed on top of Glock "with his arms outstretched like Jesus Christ," according to John Paul Frising, Luxembourg's deputy attorney general, who brought attempted murder charges against the attacker, the French-born Jacques (Spartacus) Pêcheur, 67. This was how the police found the two men at 9:30 a.m. on July 27, 1999.

Glock says he lost a quart of blood from cuts and abrasions and that he suffered seven head wounds. Yet as soon as he reached the hospital he summoned his personal bankers at UBS and Banque Ferrier Lullin. The banks held $70 million in cash, and Ewert had access to it all. By 12:30 p.m. Glock managed to move $40 million to a Swiss account. But by then Ewert had blocked the other $30 million with a court order. As he nursed his injuries, Glock wondered how he could have trusted the wrong man.

Last November Ewert was arrested and thrown into a Luxembourg jail, awaiting a Mar. 12 verdict following a three-week nonjury trial for attempted murder. If found guilty, Ewert could face up to 30 years in jail. He maintains his innocence, claiming he was framed--either by one of Glock's lawyers or family members or by the Austrian government--in order to be cheated out of his share of the company.

To appreciate the magnitude of this apparent betrayal, consider that the relationship between the two men had been a factor in the success of Glock GmbH. Ewert, a business consultant who once worked for the Luxembourg stock exchange, worked with Glock for 15 years as Glock's little-known gun became the sidearm of choice for U.S. law enforcement.

The U.S. police business was once dominated by Smith & Wesson and Beretta. Then in 1985 along came Glock with a gun made from a nylon resin that was tough enough to be made into most parts of a pistol (except the carbon steel barrel). The Glock was also revolutionary for its simple design--34 parts, compared with 60 or so for the Smith & Wesson .45 caliber semiautomatic--and its 24-ounce weight, to 25.4 ounces for the Smith & Wesson. A Glock shooter experiences a softer recoil because the gun's polymer frame flexes slightly when it's fired. Glock fans include the New York City police, U.S. Special Forces, the FBI and many international antiterrorist units.

These days Glock GmbH has an estimated $100 million in sales, two-thirds of it from the trigger-happy United States. A gun that retails for $500 can be manufactured for $75, and the company has a pretax margin nearing 60%, estimates John Farnam of Defense Training International, a LaPorte, Colo. small arms instructor.

Success has not made Glock, a highly secretive and taciturn man, any more trusting of the people around him. He has a few very high-profile friends. Among them: Pope John Paul II and Jörg Haider, former leader of Austria's ultraright Freedom Party and a Hitler admirer. At his lakefront mansion in Velden, Austria, Glock's favorite room is in the basement, where he can control the smallest detail of his home's inner workings, including the temperature of the tiles in his upstairs bathroom. He flies his own Cessna Citation jet wherever he travels. "There are fewer crazy people in the air," he says.

From his headquarters in Deutsch-Wagram, near Vienna, Glock has run through seven U.S. sales managers in 11 years. Last month his top lieutenant in the U.S., Paul Jannuzzo, a tightly wound former New Jersey prosecutor and 12-year veteran of the company, resigned as general counsel and chief operating officer.

"Jannuzzo went crazy," says Glock, without further explanation. (A source close to the company says Jannuzzo was frustrated and had tried to quit before.) Jannuzzo, 46, and Glock clashed and agreed to part ways after the annual Shot Show gun convention in Orlando, Fla. last month. Glock had hoped to retain Jannuzzo as his general counsel while assigning the operational duties to another employee. Jannuzzo will remain Glock's outside counsel and declines to comment on the situation, though he earlier told FORBES, "Mr. Glock does not shy away from a fight."

He should know. Jannuzzo spearheaded Glock's efforts to kill the Clinton Administration's voluntary gun-control effort in 2000--it was that or face a multitude of tobacco-like government-sponsored lawsuits. "Extortionist," is how Glock refers to the measures that would have introduced an oversight committee, as well as restrict how guns are sold. (The company's obstinacy resulted in 28 liability suits filed by municipalities claiming that Glock is responsible for murders committed with its weapons; 11 suits remain.) Jannuzzo also led a successful patent infringement suit against Smith & Wesson, which created a gun that looked a lot like a Glock--"I felt like my wallet was stolen," Glock hisses--and resulted in an undisclosed multimillion-dollar settlement. And Jannuzzo acted as pit bull in notifying 12 record labels that the company objects to artists using the word "Glock" in rap songs such as Dr. Dre's "Bitches Ain't ****," mainly out of fear that Glock's name will become a generic term for handgun.

Glock is now more than ever a one-man show. His two sons, Robert and Gaston Jr., and his daughter, Brigitte, have company jobs but limited authority. When asked what her role is, Brigitte cracks in German, "Being my father's personal slave." Who has input into product development? Showing rare humor, Glock smiles: "You might call it 'a very small committee.'"

And so it has been since the beginning. Back in 1981 Glock was producing plastic grenade shells for the Austrian army, in addition to plastic curtain-rod rings. One day he overheard two colonels complain that no gun existed that could meet their specifications. When Glock offered to make one, they laughed at him.

"You do not laugh at Mr. Glock," says Christopher Edwards, the burly former deputy sheriff of Jefferson County, Ky., who now runs Glock's training program in Smyrna, Ga. "He takes that personally."

Glock never doubted he could make a superior gun. "That I knew nothing was my advantage," he says. He worked on his weapon nightly in his basement. He test-fired it with his left hand so if it blew up, he could still draw a blueprint with his right. "I learned to stay out of his way," smiles his wife, Helga. The firearm surpassed all competition, and he received the army's order for 25,000 guns in 1983.

But Glock was eager to grow. Two years later he traveled to Luxembourg, a country where holding companies are not subject to income or capital gains taxation. During a chance encounter on a street in the city of Luxembourg, Glock asked a businessman if he knew someone who could help him expand his fledgling enterprise. "I am your man," said Charles Ewert, who claimed he had international connections.

He also had a reputation that Glock had not been aware of. Ewert had a habit of forming offshore companies to hold business interests for people who requested that sort of thing, earning him the sobriquet "Panama Charly." The two agreed that Glock would employ Unipatent, a shell company Ewert owned, to hold the shares of subsidiaries Glock set up to sell his guns. Unipatent, it turns out, had a dubious history. Ewert had bought the shell, which was once owned by Hakki Yaman Namli, a Turkish financier. Namli controlled the First Merchants Bank in Cyprus, and was convicted, along with the bank, of laundering $450 million in 2000. (The conviction was overturned a year later.) During the trial Namli insisted the bank was owned by Ewert.

Whatever his connections, Ewert became a public face of Glock outside Austria. Glock himself concentrated on manufacturing. In 1985 the company opened a U.S. subsidiary in Smyrna to promote sales to policemen. Good move. With the rise of drug-related crime, cops did not want to be outgunned by criminals and were trading in their six-shot revolvers for semiautomatic pistols. The Glock 17 held 18 rounds and, because it was cheap to make, few competitors could beat it on price. Its relatively few parts also made it simple to service.

Ewert opened offices in Hong Kong, France, Switzerland and Uruguay. Glock was pleased and told his family and executives that if anything ever happened to him, they should go to Ewert. "I was considered the eldest son," says Ewert, now 49.

All that changed in the spring of 1999. Glock received a call from a Geneva employee Ewert had fired. He claimed that Ewert had siphoned off corporate funds to buy a house in Switzerland, and hinted at other misdeeds. Glock brushed off the allegations as sour grapes. But to put his mind at rest, he asked Ewert for a meeting. That's when he got the rubber hammer in the head.

After his recovery from the attack, Glock says he discovered that Ewert had created dozens of offshore companies that appeared affiliated with the gunmaker, all with slightly different names and addresses. As much as $100 million, Glock's lawyers allege, had been stolen and shifted into companies Ewert controlled. Beginning in 1989, says Deputy AG Frising, Ewert was progressively taking control of Unipatent and its chief asset, U.S.-based Glock Inc. Glock's lawyers allege that Ewert awarded himself new shares in Unipatent in return for $600,000. Ewert maintains through his attorney that he did nothing without Glock's consent.

Both Ewert and Glock claim ownership of Unipatent. Each accuses the other of owning a phony set of unregistered bearer shares. "Glock says I have less than 5% of Unipatent? Glock is a nut!" says Ewert. A Luxembourg court will settle the dispute.

Ewert is unlikely to be much of a further irritant. Even if he is not convicted of attempted murder, he may face additional charges in Luxembourg for forgery, embezzlement and fraud, according to Frising, whose investigation is still pending. Failing that, he could be extradited to the U.S. Last November he was indicted on three federal counts of wire fraud in Georgia.

Glock looks forward to getting back to business--making guns and fighting what Jannuzzo calls "dumb-ass lawsuits." He's also aiming at new markets. "Saudi Arabia, Taiwan, South Africa and Hungary all have forces carrying 40-year-old guns," says Glock's marketing director, Herbert Weikinger. But before he can elaborate, Glock sends him out of the room for talking out of turn.

"The attack was the best thing that happened to me," says Glock in his heavily accented English. "Otherwise, I would have gone on trusting Ewert."



To: Janice Shell who wrote (89409)1/17/2005 9:53:06 PM
From: scion  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 122087
 
"You Don't Mess with Gaston Glock"

boosman.com

A Forbes profile of Gaston Glock, the Austrian founder of Glock GmbH, maker of handguns recommended by nine of out ten police officers and rappers alike, begins with this amazing account of an attempt on Glock's life:

He is the man behind the gun. You don't mess with Gaston Glock.
His most trusted associate allegedly tried. Lured into a dimly lit garage in Luxembourg by his colleague Charles Ewert, the Austrian Glock stopped to look at a sports car at Ewert's suggestion. Suddenly, a massive masked man leaped from behind and smashed a rubber mallet into Glock's skull. Ewert fled to the stairwell. "I am a coward," he later told Forbes. With Glock off balance, the attacker landed another crushing blow. "I was fighting for my life," recalls Glock, 73, during a rare interview with the press.

Springing up on legs toned by miles of daily swimming, Glock thrust his enormous fist into his assailant's eye socket. As the would-be assassin staggered, Glock pounded again, knocking out a few of the man's teeth. The bloodied attacker staggered, then collapsed on top of Glock "with his arms outstretched like Jesus Christ," according to John Paul Frising, Luxembourg's deputy attorney general, who brought attempted murder charges against the attacker, the French-born Jacques (Spartacus) Pêcheur, 67.

So despite that Glock was 73 years old and his attacker had the first shot -- two rubber mallet strikes to his skull -- he fought back. Holy crap! This guy doesn't need one of his guns to be a badass!

Posted by Frank Boosman at March 16, 2003 12:48 PM

Trackback Pings
TrackBack URL for this entry:
boosman.com

Comments
Ewert was condemned for 20 years for attempted murder on the 03.12.2003!
The trial for the financial aspects of the case will be held ASAP. Price Waterhouse Coopers has produced an explosiv document about the way money has been missused in and around Unipatent Holding in Luxembourg. Read the story below.

Report: Gaston Glock (Glock Inc.) involved in a attempted murder on
his person and fraudulent tax evasion.

In Austria, back in 1980-85, Mr Gaston Glock launched a series of
sidearms (pistols) whose worldwide fame, thanks to the technology
employed, does not have to be proved. Mr Gaston Glock made his
fortune at the beginning of the nineties when he was already more
than sixty years old. His commercial success is basically due to the
extraordinary results achieved in the USA. Mr Gaston Glock, along
with his family, is the proprietor of the firm Glock Ges. m.b.H in
Austria. He holds direct control of 50% of the group's subsidiaries
and of the other 50% via Unipatent Holding SA, of Luxembourg, this
being for reasons of fiscal abstraction/fraud. Both entities hold 50%
each of Glock Inc. Smyrna (VA). This latter company was created in
1986. Unipatent Holding SA was used by Mr Gaston Glock for forwarding
very considerable sums each year, officially to pay royalties and
other expenses. It should be noted that production costs in Austria
amount to US$ 115-130 and that the inter-company selling price is
around US$ 200 ( The end-user price around 450-500 USD). Since the
margin of US$ 70-85 per unit produced is enormous, the profit is
taxable in its entirety. In fact, and according to the contract, 14%
of the volume produced went into Unipatent Holding and must have been
transferred into Mr Gaston Glock's private accounts. Thus Mr Gaston
Glock has seen his fortune go from nothing to about US$ 100,000,000
in 1998 in the accounts of the Ferrier & Lullin Bank of Luxembourg.
The simple aim of this operation was to abstract from the Austrian
fiscal authorities a significant portion of the profits made by Glock
Ges. m.b.H. It can be estimated that in fifteen years a sum
approaching US$ 50,000,000 has been fiscally laundered and thus that
the State of Austria has been injured. It cannot be ruled out that
the US Dept. of Treasury also considers itself to be injured by
these manipulations. The fact of artificially increasing the import
price of products in the USA can be considered by the American
authorities as a straight deception. Moreover, Mr Gaston Glock and Mr
Charles Ewert have created a whole structure of Off-Shore companies
in other countries in order to abstract other sums from the local tax
departments and especially to protect G.Glock assets against
potential US litigations.
Mr Gaston Glock has bonds of friendship with the party on a political
level and personally with the leader of the FPOe (Mr J. Haider) in
Austria and is commonly recognised to be a main sponsor of that
political right extremist party. Further, Gaston Glock, is
considered by journalists as a supporter of an historical well known
right extremist "german" ideology.
Mr Charles Ewert (Luxembourg). In 1986, a contract was signed between
Mr Gaston Glock and himself for management of the funds and
administration of Unipatent Holding SA and the companies that the
latter controlled and still controls today. When the agreement was
finalised a share certificate for LFr 1,250,000 was handed over to
Mr. Glock. Mr Charles Ewert has since 1990 created a considerable
structure of offshore companies consisting of more than 70 units. At
the same time, whilst acquiring numerous goods and assets abroad, he
keeps a very low profile in Luxembourg so as not to be liable for
taxes.

The end of July 1999: Mr Gaston Glock was visiting Luxembourg to
discuss various problems centring on suspicions that the funds were
being embezzled by Mr Charles Ewert. He was subjected to an attempt
on his life in the presence of Mr Charles Ewert who fled, leaving Mr
Gaston Glock alone to combat his assailant for more than ten minutes.
The author of this attempt is a french relation of Mr Charles Ewert
and the attempt took place on the latter's own premises, namely the
garage at the address of Mr Charles Ewert at Luxembourg. Luxembourg's
Justice Dept. charged Mr Charles Ewert with instigation and
complicity in murder. Mr Charles Ewert was temporarily set free after
two days of imprisonment for lack of sufficient evidence.
It afterwards turned out that Mr Charles Ewert, without either
informing Mr Gaston Glock nor with his apparent consent, had
increased the capital of Unipatent Holding SA to LFr 25,000,000. Mr
Charles Ewert was thus able to progressively take control of the
Glock group and decide its future. Mr Charles Ewert saw himself
confronted from the moment that Mr Gaston Glock wanted to meet him on
account of suspicions of embezzling funds to the situation where Mr
Gaston Glock was going to ask for detailed explanations regarding the
accounts of Unipatent Holding SA and the probable misappropriation of
funds for personal use or to revoke the trustee contract with Mr
Charles Ewert, which would have had brought into broad daylight the
machinery he had put into place to take control of the Glock group.
November 1999: Mr Charles Ewert was apparently charged following a
criminal complaint brought by the UBS at Luxembourg against two
collaborators for embezzlement. According to Mr Gaston Glock and his
advocates a sum of approximately 30,000,000 US$ had thus been
misappropriated by Mr Charles Ewert in the course of the years.

The actors strategies

Mr Charles Ewert: For at least 10 years Mr Charles Ewert had to at
all costs hide from any third parties and Mr Gaston Glock in
particular the increases in the capital of Unipatent Holding. As Mr
Gaston Glock saw his personal fortune invested partly in Luxembourg
grow over the course of the years he was not unduly worried. Mr
Charles Ewert had to keep a low profile towards the Luxembourg
authorities and Mr Gaston Glock but outside of Luxembourg he acted as
if he was the sole proprietor of 50% of the Glock group and acquired
assets via one of the numerous companies he had set up over the
years. The founding of various companies was, from Mr Charles Ewert's
point of view, judicious in respect of taking control of the Glock
group when the time came and/or when it was ultimately floated on the
stock exchange, upon which he could gain several million US$ at a
stroke.
During this period Mr Gaston Glock saw himself as the legitimate
proprietor of Unipatent Holding, Mr Charles Ewert being no more to
him than a proxy/man of straw. Therefore it is not surprising that Mr
Gaston Glock had relative trust in Mr Charles Ewert for numerous
years until the start of 1999 and wanted to hide his relationship
with Unipatent Holding from ALL third parties, including the Austrian
and American tax authorities. This even went so far as for him to
prefer to wrongfully accuse third parties in order to protect the
fraudulent system he had set up. This trust was such that Mr Gaston
Glock neither checked nor had the accounts of Unipatent Holding
evaluated for more than ten years, which is manifestly an act of
reprehensible and criminal negligence, all the more so when regular
auditing would have immediately put a stop to the misappropriation of
the US$ 30,000,000 mentioned above.
We also note that the whole of the Ewert group is directed by two or
three persons and that inspection (auditing) is performed by the same
staff, which is a feature of Luxembourg that is incompatible with the
principle of transparency and equity and leaves the door open to all
kinds of abuses. Moreover, Mr Charles Ewert is implicated in various
cases of misappropriation of funds, one of which, at Frankfurt,
involves DM 40,000,000 and concerns a group of companies called
Megatrend. He is also implicated in several cases of fraud and
deception, for which a significant number of charges have been laid.
At the Luxembourg Parquet Mr Charles Ewert is considered a swindler,
a fraud and a dangerous person linked with unsavoury circles (mafia).

URL's of interest:
profil.at[]
=0011&xmlval_AUSGABE[]=2001_14&mdoc_id=2212867&content=main
parlinkom.gv.at
parlinkom.gv.at
g19.org
meome.de
fortunecity.com
packing.org
guardian.co.uk
ninety-eight.net
glock.com
investi.virtualave.net (mafia Police
report)
derstandard.at (search in the " Archiven " under Gaston
Glock)