SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Just the Facts, Ma'am: A Compendium of Liberal Fiction -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Sully- who wrote (26801)1/17/2005 11:10:29 AM
From: TigerPaw  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 90947
 
A question poses it self at this point- why don't they let the scientists go if the weapons don't exist? Why do they have Iraqi scientists like Huda Ammash, Rihab Taha and Amir Al Saadi still in prison? Perhaps they are waiting for those scientists to conveniently die in prison? That way- they won't be able to talk about the various torture techniques and interrogation tactics...

siliconinvestor



To: Sully- who wrote (26801)1/17/2005 12:32:52 PM
From: Orcastraiter  Respond to of 90947
 
Read the summary. No WMD found. No conclusive evidence of any capabilities or manufacture of chemical weapons. Some speculation with regard to intent...that's it.

You want me to read a specific portion of the report then you post it here with the link. Otherwise it's more of the same. No hard evidence of Saddam's intent or capability to attack the US. Just as General Zinni said.

Orca


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News