Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Alan Smithee who wrote (95639)	1/17/2005 2:44:56 PM
From: Neeka	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793779

I read somewhere........not going to look for it.......that the GOP, in consultation with leading attorneys who specialize in elections, have been told that the evidence for for a revote is the strongest case they've ever seen. Maybe there is hope?

To: Alan Smithee who wrote (95639)	1/17/2005 3:07:50 PM
From: Neeka	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793779

Good! The Shark is getting national attention. M Media Alert I'll be on Fox News' Special Report with Brit Hume this evening at 6pm EST / 3 pm PST, speaking about the voting irregularities. My first ever interview on a national TV news program! Posted by Stefan Sharkansky at 11:56 AM \| Comments soundpolitics.com

To: Alan Smithee who wrote (95639)	1/17/2005 9:14:35 PM
From: KLP	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 793779

Hopefully the Republicans can be clear to each of the judges, exactly what was wrong to EACH of the ballots, item by item. I'd be more than interested myself to see: HOW dead people voted, HOW convicted felons voted, HOW more than 300 provisional ballots were put into the voting machines "by mistake", HOW so many ballots were "found suddenly" weeks after the election, HOW more ballots were counted than there were voters who voted ...maybe as many as 3,000 more , and HOW ANYONE expected the military ballots to be sent out 2 or 3 weeks before the election, and HOW they expected they would arrive back in time to be counted. In fact, how many really were counted...? Exactly..... Hope the Judges who are in charge of hearing this mess are pretty sharp folks. Do you know what the background for each of the WA State Supremes is, or how we can find out?