Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Just the Facts, Ma'am: A Compendium of Liberal Fiction -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lazarus_Long who wrote (26840)	1/17/2005 3:01:03 PM
From: one_less	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 90947

"You think maybe he's on something?" Yes. I don't believe in spontaneously generated utopias. But, we will never know for certain if he was right or wrong, now that we've taken a stand and unseated corrupt and evil tyranny.

To: Lazarus_Long who wrote (26840)	1/17/2005 4:26:53 PM
From: Orcastraiter	Respond to of 90947

After GW1, Bush I and Clinton back burnered Iraq. They kept up the sanctions and the no-flies...that was it. No one seemed to care about any progress in Iraq. Saddam was inconsequential to the US. Ok then now in the post 9-11 world. In the confusion of bad intelligence a new approach was needed...we all agree on that. Where we differ is on the nature of the approach. Winger neo-cons - Bomb the hell out of anyone that looks or even smells like a terrorist. Progressives - We need additional military strength in the area right now, go after bin Laden with full military force, strengthen our diplomatic efforts, reopen sleeping demands of Saddam, gather our allies and especially the moderate Arab nations, re-visit the Palestine Israel issues. I don't have to explain what we got...Iraqmire. Orca