Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tom C who wrote (93828)	1/17/2005 4:41:29 PM
From: epicure	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 108807

If a better scientific explanation comes along it would be a pleasure to read about it, though. And of course it could happen. I wonder if creationists are always looking for better creation scenarios, or creators, to fit the facts?

To: Tom C who wrote (93828)	1/17/2005 4:47:38 PM
From: one_less	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 108807

Oh, you are back to that...tsk. Now that it has been stated for you umpteen times, 1) no one has a problem with studying creation or teaching scientific method and the resulting empirical evidence. 2) no one has a problem with studying creation or teaching scientific method and the resulting empirical evidence. 3) no one has a problem with studying creation or teaching scientific method and the resulting empirical evidence. 4) no one has a problem with studying creation or teaching scientific method and the resulting empirical evidence. 5) no one has a problem with studying creation or teaching scientific method and the resulting empirical evidence. 6) no one has a problem with studying creation or teaching scientific method and the resulting empirical evidence. 7) no one has a problem with studying creation or teaching scientific method and the resulting empirical evidence. I can't help but notice you once again skirting the issue of teaching THEORY of evolution of the universe as a singular truth... even though it is not supported by the first 7 facts in this post.