Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: JDN who wrote (95710)	1/18/2005 11:12:39 AM
From: KLP	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793782

This minute, I still have some hope that the judges will see that there were definitely problems with this election, and do something about it. And yes, I hope that the people who actually are found to have done any vote fraud, if there is vote fraud, are found guilty, and go to jail. Sadly, I have hope...but not many expectations here on this score.

To: JDN who wrote (95710)	1/18/2005 12:57:54 PM
From: Neeka	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 793782

Let's see if the judges choose to ignore Washington Administrative Code. M Election Certified in Violation of Agency Rules It's not only common sense that dictates you can't certify an election unless the number of ballots matches the number of voters. There is even a Secretary of State agency rule that mandates as much. Somehow the election was certified even though it's pretty clear that King County didn't even come close to reconciling their ballot and voter numbers. The following "emergency rule" was issued on August 24, 2004: WAC 434-253-204 Precinct or poll site ballot reconciliation -- Precinct count optical scan and direct recording devices. Poll site ballots shall be reconciled in the following manner: (1) Each precinct or poll site ballot counter shall print out results immediately following the closing of the polls. A copy of the results will be posted at the poll site or otherwise made available for public inspection. (2) The total of votes cast from each counter shall be reconciled with the number of signatures in the poll book(s) prior to transporting to the counting center. The total number of ballots reported on the results printout should equal the number of signatures in the poll book(s). Discrepancies shall be reported and explained by the Inspector. (3) In a sealed container, the data pack/chip of each ballot counter shall be transported to the counting center with each results printout. (4) The number of ballots issued should equal the number of ballots counted plus any ballots not counted. Ballots not counted may include, but not be limited to: Provisional ballots, ballots referred to the canvassing board, ballots to be enhanced or duplicated, ballots with write-in votes, any out-sorted ballots, spoiled ballots. (5) Any discrepancies must be investigated. At a minimum, the following areas must be checked until the discrepancy is resolved: (a) Check the accuracy of the ballot accountability form. (b) Recount the signatures in the poll book. (c) Ballot counter/direct recording device results. (d) Check the spoiled ballots. (e) Check the provisional ballots. (f) Count the ballot stubs. (g) Check the poll site supplies for ballots. (h) Manually count the number of ballots. (i) Call the poll workers. (6) All steps to reconcile each precinct shall be documented, including any discrepancies that cannot be resolved. Reconciliation of all precincts shall be completed and presented to the county canvassing board before the election may be certified. For whatever reason, King County determined it was unnecessary to comply with this agency rule. But it did everything possible to comply with the agency rule allowing everybody and their dog to register at the county administration building. hat tip: Bob Williams of the Evergreen Freedom Foundation Posted by Stefan Sharkansky at 07:55 AM \| Comments (12) soundpolitics.com www1.leg.wa.gov leg.wa.gov