To: Mary Cluney who wrote (95723 ) 1/18/2005 11:43:29 AM From: Lane3 Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 793817 What was Dr. Summers thinking? I can't imagine. Given the current scenario at Harvard, he certainly had to understand that there would be controversy. <<A Harvard spokesperson declined to comment on Monday, or to release the transcript of Summers's remarks. Richard Freeman, who invited the Harvard president to speak at the conference, said Summers's comments were intended to provoke debate, and some women over-reacted. "Some people took offence because they were very sensitive," said Dr Freeman, an economist at Harvard and the London School of Economics. "It does not seem to me insane to think that men and women have biological differences." During Summers's presidency, the number of tenured jobs offered to women has fallen from 36% to 13%. Last year, only four of 32 tenured job openings were offered to women. - Guardian Unlimited © Guardian Newspapers Limited 2005 >>Is it possible for a woman to become the best marathoner in the world some time in the near future? I don't know how useful it is to focus on an athletic example. That is the area where men and women have the most conspicuous differences, far greater than in math. I do recall reading, though, a while back that women are actually better suited to endurance sports so if a woman is ever to be the best in the world, the marathon would be a likely place. On one side of the issue we have the cavemen, who are attached to the notion that women are inferior. On the other side we have a species of groupist that believes that all result disparities are the result of discrimination. Neither is reasonable. Individuals of both sexes vary across every range based on physical, cultural, and personal variations so individuals can only be fairly assessed as individuals.