Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: epicure who wrote (93905)	1/18/2005 2:20:37 PM
From: one_less	Respond to of 108807

"It's more important to look at the questions, ...' You can't do that and be dismissive in the same breath...but you can say it and be dismissive in the same breath. Good job.

To: epicure who wrote (93905)	1/18/2005 2:38:40 PM
From: cosmicforce	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 108807

<It takes someone who doesn't believe it, to test it thoroughly.> Or, preferably, the unquestionable detectability of the alien him/her/itself, plainly visible or sensible to all. Like the temperature of the room, the presence of aliens would best be established through an objective measurement. Just an ugly guy in a suit and in possession of anal probes SAYING that they are an alien wouldn't cut the mustard. It would be particularly convincing to have a biopsy sample over several tissues to establish non-terrestrial origin by DNA or other biochemistry, hither to not seen...