Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : GOPwinger Lies/Distortions/Omissions/Perversions of Truth -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Patricia Trinchero who wrote (35817)	1/19/2005 3:14:16 AM
From: geode00	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 173976

If Bush really wanted to know if Saddam had WMDs for sure (as if we couldn't tell) then he would have let the inspectors run their course. He couldn't let the inspectors finish because that would have taken out the inane lynchpin in his lies. The Bush WMD stories are absolutely bizarre: - ships with drones that could deliver nukes to the Eastern Seaboard - chemical weapons trucks running around the country Who the heck made up these ridiculous nutcase lies? He's still blaming the CIA but it was Cheney who sat down and pressured analysts into falsifying their reports. The WH then falsified their reports even further by taking out all of the caveats. This wasn't a failure of intelligence, it was a deliberate scam on the American Public. Now, can it be believed that Iran is within months of enriching uranium to give to terrorist groups? Huh? Bush et al have been wrong about everything in the ME. Does anyone remember how each province was to have an American military governor? What happened to that idea? It's unbelievable how little information gets out, gets repeated and gets remembered.