SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Investment Chat Board Lawsuits -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bear Down who wrote (6987)1/19/2005 2:05:44 PM
From: Jeffrey S. Mitchell  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 12465
 
The extortion charge is what will determine if Elgindy is or is not perceived as a criminal, although I do think the obstruction of justice charge, being black and white (i.e. that Elgindy himself ordered logs erased-- as opposed to Peters speaking for him as in the case of the alleged Paul Brown shakedown), will stick.

- Jeff



To: Bear Down who wrote (6987)1/20/2005 7:23:14 PM
From: Pluvia  Respond to of 12465
 
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!! i hear that.... very interesting how long this is taking... even if the jury got a 10lb stack of instructions, they should have been able to read each instruction 4x and vote by now....

I think I would like to see a full acquittal for no other reason than to listen to all the whack jobs here come up with more conspiracy theories. should be much more entertaining that the " I told ya so's" if he is convicted


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News