Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Anthony @ Equity Investigations, Dear Anthony, -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Janice Shell who wrote (89462)	1/19/2005 8:21:01 PM
From: Bear Down	Respond to of 122087

actually i think there were a couple of small trades that fit that pattern if memory serves correct. Maybe i read it in the indictment, not sure

To: Janice Shell who wrote (89462)	1/19/2005 8:49:33 PM
From: hedgefundman	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 122087

but 'tis simple for jury. they don't have message boards dissecting every which way or possibility. see what they asked for? jury won't be looking second by second. simple really. Jurors requested evidence relating to Elgindy's trading records. They also asked for evidence relating to Royer's searches of FBI databases, as well as records of telephone calls between Elgindy and Royer before and after these database searches. Jeff's point is that it wouldn't have been that simple. A calls fbi agent, agent searches database, A makes trade. not about amount of time - one criminal act is 'nuff. can't jest say "ooooops" just a coincidence, din't peak, din't see it - don't need no stinkin' stolen fbi info, ooops did i say "stolen?" remember the glee, the joy, the celebrations of all with FBI cards on posteriors and foreheads? coincidence? "t'aint me?" collectin' "bidness" cards? for fun? or for potential profit? get together at vegas just to play the craps? smell taste babeeeeee. In addition, Elgindy was getting information from Royer for a relatively short time; about a year. He'd been running his site and selling short for quite awhile before that. In fact, that's what I find most pathetic. He didn't need Royer or Royer's information. And some of Royer's information was wrong: the stuff about Paul Brown being a convicted felon. Why didn't he just continue on his own? Much of the stuff he got from Royer was available from public sources anyway. yup - pathetic - the EZ way - jury won't like it. shares don't appear out of the sky like mana from heaven to close out short. make tough phone calls - get free shares - stop calls - stop shortnin' - bread in pocket - sheeple get a slice? smell taste babeeee.