Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Just the Facts, Ma'am: A Compendium of Liberal Fiction -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: DavesM who wrote (27218)	1/20/2005 12:42:27 PM
From: trouthead	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 90947

Clintons attacks were small and targeted for specific reasons. Some of which have turned out to be for suspect reasons. I am not against removing Saddam. I am against the most powerful nation using it muscle without a damn good reason. I would even go as far to say that I would rather risk an attack than attack the wrong person. Just as I would rather not sentence a murderer to death on the chance the system made a mistake and we kill an innocent person. But I wouldn't let that person out of jail, just as I wouldn't have let Saddam out from under a very watchful eye. I know that most of you will say we had a damn good reason. We disagree. jb