SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: michael97123 who wrote (156712)1/22/2005 12:43:00 PM
From: neolib  Respond to of 281500
 
Its up on my list. Maybe because two big building once almost fell on my head. OR perhaps it is because i witnessed folks jumping from the Towers. Or maybe because i have had health issues since i returned to my job before the air was clear enough to do so. Please tell me of the worse dangers you face at home.. I am curious. Mike

That would do it for you alright!

As I pointed out in one previous exchange with you, I tend to look at the results of things independently of the causes. So if my risk of harm from cause X is 0.00y I look at that regardless of the source. The nature of the source impacts what I do to reduce my risks.

Since I live in a rural area, far from any major city, I don't see terrorism as a major threat, except for international travel, and for investment reasons. Local crime, heart disease, accidents, the overall local economy, etc are all much greater issues for me. The biggest impact I feel from terrorism is our own response. Military demands on reservists I know (a reservist chaplain has been gone for about 70% of the time since 9/11 leaving a wife and 4 kids), market jolts on investments, airport hassles, international views on American tourists, etc.

I have a brother that lives in Silicon Valley though. If I lived there, I would no doubt rank potential terrorism higher on my list.