Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (156781)	1/21/2005 4:37:04 PM
From: marcos	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

There's a difference? ... What, are you stalling for time till i croak and can't get to a tough question? ... Have philosophers become so distinct from men and women that they need a separate morality? ... Will we have to re-define marriage for them too now? ... Why don't we wrap in everything down to frigin pollywogs and be done with it? ... What is up with you splitters anyway, that you can't see where proper lumping should be done? ... Can these be considered procedural and not Deadly Serious Questions so as not to unduly occupy thread space with this random splitting malarkey? ... Why not just answer the question in a split form if you insist it be split? ... Given its absolute lack of relativity as previously handed down to us, how can morality fail to have united basis in absolutivity nearer its root and before the philosophers-men/women split? ... but never mind that for now - How about answering the postal DSQ in as split or lumped form as you like, direct yes or no answers, so we can move on down the line through the messier stuff like absolute morality of the lord thy god is a jealous god clause and whose god anyway so when i get back here again later there will be something to reply to? - Is morality absolute?