Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Banned.......Replies to the A@P thread. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: hedgefundman who wrote (2315)	1/22/2005 2:08:47 PM
From: olivier asser	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 5425

I remember "weeeeeeeeeeeeeee" as goin with the <<<<<<<<<<<<----------------. Now why no discussion of the jury requests here, for example Royer saying to his FBI colleague he never gave any confidential info to AP, then "changing his mind" on the stand in a federal court? If I were on the jury, I would wonder why AP did not testify. I mean, he was obviously unafraid of making 16,836 posts here at SI and his public "investigation" reports, in both cases where he controlled - oops, I mean "moderated" - the discussion, but when it comes to testifying under oath, where he can be cross-examined and required to answer to evidence entered into the record, all of a sudden he clams up completely. It's his right of course, but if everything was above board I'd think his testimony would be a very important part of the defense, considering his willingness to speak here in public. Why at SI and not in court? Maybe that's because AP had no power to "ban" or "moderate" into oblivion AUSA in court, or boot jury members if it turns out they don't agree with his visions on reality.