Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Idea Of The Day -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: IQBAL LATIF who wrote (47674)	1/23/2005 3:48:09 AM
From: IQBAL LATIF	Respond to of 50167

Result and consequence of a positively fanatic orgy of freethinking; Indian? As I'm about Kashmir poetry recital (sponsored by the Jammu-Kashmir SOAS society of which I am treasurer) my mind was drifting over to Hindustan. I remember Suman Palit discussed at length a South Asian Federation a while while back and I've always been intrigued by the concept. I promised to take up the issue but I never did instead writing the Arab East Trilogy, no doubt one of my best works, and turning my interest to Iraq's liberation. With war won and dusted, a foregone conclusion, and the American victorious in their efforts to revitalise Iraq and Afghanistan into new states I want to return to more esoteric topics such as state-building, national identity and civilization orientation. But the question to Suman should be aren't we Indian instead of merely South Asian? Of course this is what Indians, Hindus and particularly Muslims, insist upon and is what Indian identity is built upon. If the answer is yes then wouldn't Pakistan be a cipher, another Muslim endeavour that ended up in failure like the rest... Now before I handle such an intense question (intense that is for me) I want to explain my thought process. Like my father I quite sure of my impressive strides of originality, i.e. I know virtually noone who shares my mindset (or that of my father come to think of it) and which is why I'm controversial. I think fellow webloggers, when I was more active, explained the startling and seemingly haphazard ideas issuing from the cavern (a few come to mind like military rule is good for Pakistan and Muslims; Pashtuns should have tribal law; Israel and Palestine should be reintegrated). away by pointing out my (relatively) extreme youthand consequent immaturity. As my handful of readers know very well I've been deeply influenced by writers and thinkers (most Jewish) ; primarily Samuel Huntington (extremely so in that I'm probably a Huntingtonian), Bernard Lewis (with whom I respectfully disagree with), Jared Diamond (who shaped my global view), Milton Friedman (though my readings of his works are somewhat sparser we are often in complete agreement) and Bernard Russell (though when i read Russell I had already my "ideology" in place and found myself agreeing rather than learning per se). From each of these thinkers I pick and choose to create my own thread of ideas for instance from Russell I share an extremely deep attachment for localism and federalism (I'm surelythe only 20yr to find congressional redistricting and provinicialism remotely interesting), whereas when I read Samuel Huntington's book Clash of Civilisation, at the age of thirteen, it so altered my outlook to the extent that I could never look at geopolitics in the same manner as I had done before. My traditional adolescent pride in Indo-Iranian "Aryan" cultures (i.e Zoroastrianism and Hinduism), fuelled no doubt by my early readings of Greek mythology at 8 & 9, complemented by a very anti-Muslim outlook (Arab conquerors were barbarians who destroyed sophisticated and fragile civilisations in the Middle East & South Asia) to a more rounded appreciation for Islamic civilisation. My thought process evolved philosophically so as to reconcile my hetrodox beliefs with pride in Pakistan, and consequently Islamic civilisation, thereby stimulating my thoughts on the "secular" Ummah. To be continued... I started the weblog when I was 17 and most of my best writing, or most prolific, are between 17 and 18, at 19 I think the website started to trail off when I was 19 as I was writing to write rather than my thoughts. Zachary Latif 17:10