Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Banned.......Replies to the A@P thread. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jeffrey S. Mitchell who wrote (2361)	1/23/2005 11:43:23 AM
From: Buckey	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 5425

MY good god I can't read all that. on another topic. I have, over th years, seen many lawsuits against posters and I think AZNT was one of the ones that actually may have got as far as an agreement for both sides to cease. Anyway I get a kick out of them as most of those Company's have R/S many times and / or have gone kaput. Has anyone ever actually paid out a settlement to a company.

To: Jeffrey S. Mitchell who wrote (2361)	1/23/2005 12:25:53 PM
From: Pluvia	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 5425

Excellent point Jeff. breen seems to be trying to re-define "inside information" by claiming essentially any information that IS publicly available, BUT NOT disseminated according to breen's definition - is trading on inside information…. to take breen's argument one step further, it appears as breen is attempting to re-define stock manipulation as any person who takes a securities position and then disseminates the public information they discovered thru proper due diligence. very disturbing if true. if found guilty, essentially everyone long or short publishing good research could be considered committing stock manipulation.