Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Banned.......Replies to the A@P thread. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: olivier asser who wrote (2382)	1/23/2005 8:36:10 PM
From: Janice Shell	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 5425

I think the above is why Ken Breen spoke of the membership and possible further action. I would not be surprised, if this trial results in a guilty verdict on the RICO counts, that asset seizures may be that further action. So, there may be quite a large group of people who have quite a bit riding on what the jury decides. I agree with Pluvia that Breen is unnaturally and dangerously obsessed with this case, and that he's blown it all out of proportion. The chief bad guy should be Royer; after all, he's the one who betrayed his agency for personal gain. As for the RICO charges, we'll see. They're notoriously difficult to prove. Not so long ago Les Price of MDMN got off scot free on charges arising from the Bermuda Short operation. I don't think anyone who'd followed Price over the years doubted that he was in fact guilty.