Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bush-The Mastermind behind 9/11? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Raymond Duray who wrote (9706)	1/23/2005 10:40:35 PM
From: twmoore	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 20039

I have no reason to doubt that Alexander Filipov was on AA11 on the morning of 9/11. I still have lingering doubt that it was this plane that struck the WTC Why do you have doubts and if so,how do you explain the missing passengers?

To: Raymond Duray who wrote (9706)	1/23/2005 10:46:14 PM
From: LPS5	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20039

[T]he government's unwillingness to provide the highest quality video of the attacks speaks volumes. Such a situation might "speak volumes" with relevant, credible supporting documentation accompanying it...but barely whispers in the absence of such. So: what evidence do you have that such a video exists, let alone that it is being held hostage by the government? Message 20907904 Haven't we been down this road before? I've searched in vain for a single video or photo that showed the tail numbers of any of the purported attack jets on 9/11. Tail numbers are one of the key determinants as to what we are really looking at. This is an interesting depiction of the phenomenon referred to as "logical dissonance." You've produced a ridiculously elaborate theory about bombs in the towers (which were, as the story goes, the 'real' cause of the building collapse, although I'm amazed by the pilots' ability to navigate the planes into the floors just above where the "bombs" were purportedly planted); listed shadowy groups, various and sundry, that you assert played a role in what is on one hand a massive conspiracy involving hundreds (if not thousands) of individuals in various levels of government...but yet implicates only the Bush Administration; and have gone so far as to suggest that skeptics of these heavy-on-emotion-light-on-evidence theories are in fact a part of the greater conspiracy... Message 20858345 ...and, notwithstanding all that, are now suggesting that the existence of a clear photo of the tail of any of the aircraft would otherwise be a "key determinant" as to verifying, for your purposes, what was really occurring? ROFL!!! NTSB was denied the right to investigate, by a shadowy and secret new bureaucracy called the TSA, the Transportation Security Agency[.] Again: as evidenced by what? e