Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ilaine who wrote (96565)	1/24/2005 1:53:32 PM
From: Lane3	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 793698

Spatial ability is, of course, traditionally considered to be a "male" ability. If we did things the way you suggest, my superior spatial ability would be irrelevant, because I am female, thus, cannot possibly be wired better in spatial ability than males. I think you're being sidetracked by an assumption that, if we studied brain wiring, we'd find that everyone with a penis has one kind of brain wiring and everyone with a uterus another but that's not necessarily the case. There's no reason to expect it to be so binary. There could be a complex of wiring diagrams with women more likely to have a, b, and e and men more likely to have c and d. Just as men and women both have both testosterone and estrogen, there are sliding scales. You and I with our superior spatial ability (yes, that was where I always scored highest when we took those tests in high school) demonstrate that there's a sliding scale. This has always been of particular interest to me because I "score" male in a number of the thinking skills and temperament criteria. I scored a negative number on one of the Myers-Briggs criteria. When I asked how that could be I discovered that they score those things differently for men and women. I was off the chart for women on "thinking" but not for the overall population, thus the negative score. People definitely do process information differently. Even something as simple and non-gender-related as introversion and extroversion manifests in different learning and communication styles. I spent a chunk of my career facilitating group decision making. People think differently. Sometimes when working with groups you can see clearly male and female patterns but mostly not. I, for one, would like to see more study. I just hate to see the findings popularized in simplistic Mars/Venus frames because that feeds the bigotry.

To: Ilaine who wrote (96565)	1/24/2005 5:13:31 PM
From: aladin	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 793698

CB, Just when and where did I advocate discrimination? Today, yes this very day, people are advocating that medicines used specifically for blacks are some kind of domino. You seem to be advocating the same thing relative to brain function. The use of studies and research by lay bigots does not invalidate such research. BTW - the study illustrated that some right handed males were not as good at math as other right handed males and that a specific genetic indicator existed. John