Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Banned.......Replies to the A@P thread. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: SI Dave who wrote (2463)	1/24/2005 3:31:51 PM
From: olivier asser	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 5425

Did I read that right? 300 subscribers at $600 per month? Wow, that was some serious cash flow! YES. So why did AP cross the line? That was a very good living giving securities recommendations. Why tilt the industry illegally? Someone here said greed. That was surely a factor. Another one, maybe not only money but also power and control over public perception. With that many subscribers and posts on the Net there was vast influence over the marketplace, in this case, now proved beyond a reasonable doubt, in aid of a corrupt enterprise. Dave, there's no arguing that AP didn't disseminate his picks at SI. That's not illegal but if he was trading against his public picks then I'd say we have a problem, one of the charges that bothered me the most, because that's not what Tony promised readers of his SI thread. As HGM and I said, after this case hopefully SI can fulfill its vast promise, traders and investors researching together to get to the facts. That's up to every member, to make it what it can be. As I said, you and Bob have certainly done a very good job making research expedited about 1,000x with the wonderful search tools. Posts that used to take me days to track down now can be found in 30 secs.

To: SI Dave who wrote (2463)	1/24/2005 4:13:49 PM
From: Buckey	Respond to of 5425

Yeah I need a gig with 300 customers paying $600 a month with that minimal overhead. What a great Business model until -- well the rest is history

To: SI Dave who wrote (2463)	1/24/2005 7:29:23 PM
From: manny_velasco	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 5425

Hello Big boss, Take what I going to say with a grain of salt if you like but most of those stock picks tony posted are against the law. If you remember post a couple months back dealing with the subject, we agreed to wait to see what will happen with the verdict. Now i am pleading with you to please think about booting anthony@pacific name and thread for good. Whatever you do will be fine with me.