SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Anthony @ Equity Investigations, Dear Anthony, -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: olivier asser who wrote (89610)1/24/2005 6:43:42 PM
From: scion  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 122087
 
Assuming that you are implying people are rushing to confess, because of "fair inference from the indictment and public statements" - No, I don't think so.

I think that if Breen had any more prosecutions in mind they would have been called as 'witnesses' to persuade them to cooperate during the trial.

I'd say there are about a dozen people who posted prominently here in the past that if they or their counsel were not on the phone to Mr. Breen the second the verdicts were announced,well, what do you think?



To: olivier asser who wrote (89610)1/24/2005 7:12:24 PM
From: tmarsh  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 122087
 
oliver please don't private massage me. What do you do that you sit here and post all day long and respond to mine in minutes. Get a life you fricking loser without a clue. Good seeing the rest of you guys posting.



To: olivier asser who wrote (89610)1/24/2005 7:17:39 PM
From: Pluvia  Respond to of 122087
 
ummm huh.. care to name them?

I'd say there are about a dozen people who posted prominently here in the past that if they or their counsel were not on the phone to Mr. Breen the second the verdicts were announced, well, what do you think?