SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: LindyBill who wrote (96650)1/24/2005 9:37:30 PM
From: LindyBill  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793670
 
Barnett .....Two stories in the NY Times (electronic edition, of course) worth mentioning: 1) "Shiites in Iraq Say Government Will be Secular," by Dexter Filkins; and 2) "Pentagon Sends Its Spies to Join Fight on Terror," by Eric Schmitt.

On first, despite largess from Iran, local Iraqi Shiite leaders say they are committed to secularism, both because it's what the Iraqi people will expect and because the Americans will probably leave faster if they go this route. As I said on Blitzer: we shouldn't be worried about an Iraq dominated by Shiites in bed with Iran, Iran should be worried about an Iraq led by Shiites that isn't a theocracy.

On second, so many want to make a big fuss on this one. It is completely prosaic. Defense Dept. didn't really do terror before 9/11, so never cared about having "organic" (meaning, its own) intell assets devoted to that. Now, Special Ops Command is on the case big time, so voila! DoD wants its own organic assets to support SOCOM, preferring not to rely on CIA. Is this the rise of the Waffen SS, as some might hyperbolicize? Please. DoD has a host of organic intell services (all built around services, not around a command like SOCOM), and now it wants to build up its own specifically for this new task that will become a mainstay for the Special Ops Command for years to come.

Look ahead to a major terrorist strike in the US. Imagine finding out that DoD made no effort to beef up this capacity after assigning this very task to SOCOM years earlier. Imagine the finger-pointing on that one. If the intell crowd at Langley caught terrorists as well as they pen bestselling books describing their failures, then it wouldn't be an issue, but they don't. So maybe DoD should have its own intell assets, and maybe they can reach for this capability without sending the whole country into fascism.

I wish the American people just a little more faith than that. You know, we're already issuing long-term sentences on Abu Ghraib to our own people. Know any other country that moves to correct mistakes that fast?
Posted by Thomas P.M. Barnett