Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : American Presidential Politics and foreign affairs -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: sandintoes who wrote (338)	1/25/2005 9:44:20 AM
From: Peter Dierks	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 71588

That makes more sense. Democrats and their media allies are back at the we need higher taxes rant. That would explain the exchange with Dan Rather better than the Mutt and Jeff routine suggestion of mine. Yes, on the higher taxation issue, they are probably trying to bait him and set him up for the "I told you so's." Thanks for the reminder about Democrats. It is too easy to start thinking of the as too stupid to plot an election comeback, but you are correct that they are crafty and morally bankrupt. They will do or say anything to get back into power. Recently they have resembled the desperate lonely high school boy who doesn't ever understand that the girl who tells him she has to wash her hair on Saturday night is really telling him to get lost; she would rather lather than listen to his blather. Democrats will be back, even if they have to destroy half of Washington get regain their power. As far as having the guts to go toe to toe: Message 20979802

To: sandintoes who wrote (338)	1/25/2005 9:45:43 AM
From: Peter Dierks	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 71588

Memogate Prequel The right way to handle a pseudo-scandal. Tuesday, January 25, 2005 12:01 a.m. EST Regular readers of these pages will recall our scoop a little over a year ago on what came to be known on Capitol Hill as Memogate. Our publication of Democratic strategy memos on how to defeat President Bush's judicial nominees created a stir in Washington, not least because they showed how Senators Ted Kennedy, Dick Durbin and others were taking orders from liberal interest groups, even to the point of delaying a vote on a candidate for the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals until it had heard the University of Michigan affirmative action case. More than a year later, it's not over yet. Federal prosecutor David Kelley is conducting an investigation into the "stolen" memos, which were obtained by Republican staffers courtesy of a glitch in the Judiciary Committee's computer system. Manuel Miranda, staffer to Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist and former staffer to the Republican Judiciary Committee chairman Orrin Hatch, was forced to resign. Meanwhile, a memo of a different ilk has just come to light that puts Memogate into some long-needed perspective. It's a 1996 letter from Republican Representative Ben Gilman, then-chairman of the House International Relations Committee, to his Democratic counterpart, Lee Hamilton. (See the full text here.) The letter describes how Democratic staffers, taking advantage of a glitch in the committee's computer system, had been reading the private documents of the Republican staff for more than a year. Oh--did we mention that they were funneling them to the Clinton State Department? Their antics were revealed when Deputy Secretary of State Strobe Talbot called Chairman Gilman to protest drafts of two memos on Haiti that hadn't even reached Mr. Gilman's desk yet. If all this sounds familiar, the way Messrs. Gilman and Hamilton decided to deal with the matter is not. After a quiet internal investigation, they concluded that no House rules had been broken, fixed the computer system and told the Democratic staffers to stop snooping. Daniel Restrepo, the staffer cited in the letter as having leaked the documents to Mr. Talbot, never found himself in the public pillory. He was allowed to stay on the job until he left for law school some months later. In short, Messrs. Gilman and Hamilton took the political and moral high road--in part, to be sure, to save themselves the public embarrassment of airing their committee's dirty laundry but also because standing by their staff was the right thing to do. As someone who was there tells us, the Congressmen didn't want to "ruin" anyone's career. It's too bad Senators Frist and Hatch had no such compunctions. And eight years later, when Memogate was in the headlines, it's too bad Messrs. Gilman and Hamilton didn't come forward with the story of their own experience with computer snooping on Capitol Hill. opinionjournal.com