Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Banned.......Replies to the A@P thread. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Dave O. who wrote (2522)	1/25/2005 2:16:56 PM
From: olivier asser	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 5425

If you pay an investment adviser huge monthly fees for investment advice and incur losses and opportunity losses on those recommendations, please explain how those trades might fairly be labeled "self-directed"? I'm sure all those AP site members paying in total c. $3 million for AP, Pluvia, Mama Bear, Truthseeker and Goldfinder recommendations, expecting to receive honest advice, when a group of enterprise co-conspirators were front running those calls or covering into short recommendations, should be attacked for their own choice to trust AP and his group. Incredible: you go out there and scream follow all my calls, I'm honest, I never lie, my record is 90% and above; then you trade against those who trust you and you say sorry it was your own choice no one forced you but thanks for the $3 mill in investment advisory fees, we don't offer refunds! Oh, OK. You need to carefully review our mail and wire fraud statutes if you believe this kind of activity is permissible under the laws not as AP and friends interpreted them but as our judicial system does. There is something very wrong with traders believing SEC and FBI are somehow their private preserve to help them manipulate stock prices. If you don't see that, then you need to review the verdicts carefully.