SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Anthony @ Equity Investigations, Dear Anthony, -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: olivier asser who wrote (89784)1/25/2005 3:45:33 PM
From: scion  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 122087
 
Repeat question - how many companies have you reported to the SEC because you thought they were engaged in fraudulent activities?



To: olivier asser who wrote (89784)1/25/2005 3:49:04 PM
From: Pluvia  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 122087
 
<<<<EHHHHHHET>>>>

not even close oli. the only evidence you have here is you know how to cut and paste.

and, that you know how to blow 10mm while chuckling like a spoiled frat boy with your "colleagues" (lol sorry couldn't resist)

still waiting for you to prove you know your head from your ass.


>So I'm assuming that IA site members who pay fees for supposedly good faith, honest advice, have no rights in return for millions of dollars in fees they pay? When considering that position, maybe you'll review the following criminal statutes:

For the purposes of this chapter, the term “scheme or artifice to defraud” includes a scheme or artifice to deprive another of the intangible right of honest services.

TITLE 18 > PART I > CHAPTER 63 > § 1341

§ 1341. Frauds and swindles

Whoever, having devised or intending to devise any scheme or artifice to defraud, or for obtaining money or property by means of false or fraudulent pretenses, representations, or promises, or to sell, dispose of, loan, exchange, alter, give away, distribute, supply, or furnish or procure for unlawful use any counterfeit or spurious coin, obligation, security, or other article, or anything represented to be or intimated or held out to be such counterfeit or spurious article, for the purpose of executing such scheme or artifice or attempting so to do, places in any post office or authorized depository for mail matter, any matter or thing whatever to be sent or delivered by the Postal Service, or deposits or causes to be deposited any matter or thing whatever to be sent or delivered by any private or commercial interstate carrier, or takes or receives therefrom, any such matter or thing, or knowingly causes to be delivered by mail or such carrier according to the direction thereon, or at the place at which it is directed to be delivered by the person to whom it is addressed, any such matter or thing, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both. If the violation affects a financial institution, such person shall be fined not more than $1,000,000 or imprisoned not more than 30 years, or both.

TITLE 18 > PART I > CHAPTER 63 > § 1343

§ 1343. Fraud by wire, radio, or television

Whoever, having devised or intending to devise any scheme or artifice to defraud, or for obtaining money or property by means of false or fraudulent pretenses, representations, or promises, transmits or causes to be transmitted by means of wire, radio, or television communication in interstate or foreign commerce, any writings, signs, signals, pictures, or sounds for the purpose of executing such scheme or artifice, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both. If the violation affects a financial institution, such person shall be fined not more than $1,000,000 or imprisoned not more than 30 years, or both.

TITLE 18 > PART I > CHAPTER 63 > § 1346

§ 1346. Definition of “scheme or artifice to defraud”

For the purposes of this chapter, the term “scheme or artifice to defraud” includes a scheme or artifice to deprive another of the intangible right of honest services.



To: olivier asser who wrote (89784)1/25/2005 3:55:50 PM
From: Pluvia  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 122087
 
Oli, say it aint so! you're really a wanna be elgindy that failed?
what - not enough snickering frat boys to make it a success?


Message 16576447

>The guy the SEC *should* be looking into is one Olivier Asser, who sent me a ton of unsolicited emails, in which he broke a number of securities laws in the course of trying to get his own chatroom business going.

Dear Mr. Bell,

The foregoing statement you made today is false, defamatory and libelous. In view of the malicious nature of many other deliberately false statements you have directed at me here in a public forum at Silicon Investor, I find I have no other alternative.

Would you please be so kind as to provide me with the name, address and telephone number of Counsel representing you?

Thank-you.

Sincerely,

Olivier L. F. Asser