Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Just the Facts, Ma'am: A Compendium of Liberal Fiction -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Suma who wrote (27674)	1/25/2005 6:23:06 PM
From: Sully-	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 90947

What was disavowed by the Bush Admin? Links to verbatim quotes please. Are you saying that the Bush Admin is calling the 9/11 Commission, the Senate Intelligence Committee & the Iraq Survey Group all liars? Because if what you FALSELY assert is true, then Bush is calling them liars & calling all their irrefutable facts lies. But then, we both know Bush did not disavow any such thing. The facts in all the reports prove what I said was factually accurate. And that you continue to continue to believe in liberal propaganda as your version of reality. Saddam had numerous ties to terrorist groups. He harbored, trained, financed, supported & conspired with them. He continued to improve his WMD programs right up until the day he was removed. And he shared some of his WMD expertise with terrorists. Just the facts.

To: Suma who wrote (27674)	1/25/2005 6:27:42 PM
From: Sully-	Respond to of 90947

"So he was in violation of the U.N resolutions why then did not the U.N. condone our going in there ?" LOL! Are you trying to be funny? Have you not heard about the Oil-for-Food scandal & how Saddam bribed the horrifically corrupt UN along with France, Russia & China (who just happened to be members of the UN Security council with veto power)?

To: Suma who wrote (27674)	1/25/2005 6:37:34 PM
From: Sully-	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 90947

"THE original terrorist was OBL.. After 9/11 we were to go after him. Do you not think that other countries are training terrorists... Iran,Syria,Saudi Arabia. WHY Iraq.." OBL was not the ONLY terrorist. And OBL had clear ties to Saddam. That's an irrefutable fact. And we have learned since we removed Saddam that it was clearly the right thing to do in the global WOT. And oh, BTW, we did go after OBL first. And we did a great job taking away OBL's main domain for training terrorists, killed thousands of al qaeda terrorists, including most of their leadership & put OBL on the run. Apparently those facts have escaped your version of history. Why Iraq? Gee Suma, we already had thousands of troops there with Saddam shooting at them daily in violation of UN Resolutions. Should we have removed them to go take out another terror sponsoring country first? OH wait! We did go elsewhere first. Afghanistan! Do you think the US has unlimited resources?

To: Suma who wrote (27674)	1/25/2005 6:38:57 PM
From: Selectric II	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 90947

I worry we will never get OBL. We just have a high bounty on his head. Our interests seem to have gone elsewhere. I think we might be much better off if we just knew where he was and what he was doing, without him knowing that we knew. He would become marginalized as an effective leader very quickly and his minions could be exposed and picked off, one by one. He wouldn't become a "martyr" in his followers' eyes. At the same time, no new leadership would rise to fill the gap and take his place. Hmm. Isn't that what's happening now?<g>

To: Suma who wrote (27674)	1/25/2005 6:42:11 PM
From: jlallen	Respond to of 90947

The above has been disavowed by the Bush administration. Incorrect. You need to get a handle on the facts....

To: Suma who wrote (27674)	1/25/2005 6:43:29 PM
From: Sully-	Respond to of 90947

"When one extends all ones energies into one place and in my opinion the wrong place our energies are dissipated." Typical liberal revisionist history. Do you think we have only spent time, energy & resources in Iraq? if you do, you are sadly mistaken. We have resources in multiple countries fighting the GWOT & have had them there for years. That's a fact. And the Iraq Survey Group, that has real first hand facts on their side, completely disagrees with you. They believe that Saddam's Iraq was far more dangerous that we believed it was before we removed him. But then, the Iraq Survey Group drew their conclusions from real facts, unlike you.