Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Anthony @ Equity Investigations, Dear Anthony, -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: olivier asser who wrote (89850)	1/25/2005 7:49:10 PM
From: Pluvia	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 122087

ok oli, so you want answers? define "front run" >Why would AP be indicted for front running? Why would a United States Attorney allege in the indictment, and then file considerable evidence that resulted in two dozen criminal convictions, that AP did not act alone and in public strongly hint that further indictments are forthcoming? Why have neither you, nor Pluvia, nor the conspicuously absent Mama Bear and Sir Auric Goldfinger, ever stated categorically here that you did not trade in front of or against the calls? Keeping your options open? The Truthseeker, Mssr. Goldfinger, Anthony@PACIFIC, Pluvia Securities and a group of the most talented fraud busting Soldiers are on the AMPD case. On Behalf of Pluvia Securities, we want you to know the following: To: nikita who wrote (124) 9/11/1999 9:35:00 AM From: Pluvia Read Replies (2) of 538 *STRONG SELL SHORTSELL AMPD & AMPDW* Good Morning Ms & Mssrs Bains, Harris Freedman and Sharon Wills, the Management and promoters of AMPD... I hope you have all had the chance to sell your stock and buy tickets out of the country, because from now on, life is going to get very complicated for you here in the good 'ol USA... The Truthseeker, Mssr. Goldfinger, Anthony@PACIFIC, Pluvia Securities and a group of the most talented fraud busting Soldiers are on the AMPD case. On Behalf of Pluvia Securities, we want you to know the following: 1. We have uncovered your scheme to defraud the public. 2. We have uncovered how you have misled the public and your shareholders with your most recent press release. We believe you committed FRAUD and we are working to have you prosecuted for that FRAUD. 3. We know you did not develop nor do you own any new technology that will provide 2MPS, 50 mile wireless internet access that you describe here in your press release dljdirect.com. 4. We know the wireless internet access products you describe in your September 9, 1999 press release: (i) Are NOT products AMPD developed or introduced; (ii) The technology for the products you mention is over TWO YEARS OLD; (iii) The products and the technology for the products was developed by other companies; (iv) During the past TWO YEARS that these products have been used, they have been proven to be UNECONOMICAL - AND SIGNIFICANTLY MORE EXPENSIVE THAN COMPETING TECHNOLOGIES SUCH AS DSL AND CABLE INTERNET ACCESS. We want you to know, we have uncovered significant additional details of your business that you have not released to the public... But best of all, come Monday morning the world is going to know these things also... Have a nice weekend, and STAY TUNED.... Much more to come... All comments are the EXPRESS opinion of the Author, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED...

To: olivier asser who wrote (89850)	1/25/2005 8:19:14 PM
From: Janice Shell	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 122087

Back in the ninties, an interesting case was heard in, I think, the New York State Supreme Court. (Could be wrong about the court, but it was definitely in New York. I'm too lazy to go hunt for it.) It was alleged that a number of shortsellers had conspired to short a number of stocks. Phone records and the like were produced. They were acquitted. The judge (there was no jury) ruled that since they were in the same line of work, it was unsurprising that they talked about stocks and picks among themselves. I would hope that Tony's attorneys used that ruling to help make their case.