To: Grainne who wrote (94789 ) 1/26/2005 10:37:35 AM From: Oeconomicus Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 108807 "The problem is, your interpretation of the whole ruling is inaccurate." Oh? How so? Please be specific. Failure to substantiate such an assertion is such poor form."I am really tired of opening posts and finding that they are long, hostile, argumentative, snippy and WRONG!!!" There you go again. Long? No. Besides, you asked "Do you disagree? And why?" I answered. Hostile and snippy? Asking you to substantiate your assertions and disagreeing with your interpretations is "hostile" and "snippy"? LOL. A wee bit defensive, aren't we?"I think I will just stop responding to posts like that, because nothing is gained." Post like what? This? Message 20980441 Pardon me for asking you to explain the basis for your "feelings" about a news story. Sheesh!"I'm tired of being chased around by a bunch of people with plenty of agenda and attitude but no correct information..." Perhaps you could be so kind as to point out, specifically and with substantiation, what you find INcorrect. And if you don't want to "[be] chased around" for an explanation of statements like "this just blows me away", don't make them."This is not really a serious political thread, as you must know." That seems clear. PS: Do you think laws prohibiting bumper stickers with extremely vulgar or obscene words violate your free speech rights? If so, do you think your right to display "fu<k" or "$hit" on your bumper outweighs my right to NOT have obscenities imposed upon me or my children? And don't you think it's sad that some people are so immature or so inarticulate and stupid that they can't express their political views without resorting to such ugliness?