SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Lane3 who wrote (96967)1/26/2005 12:04:39 PM
From: Lady Lurksalot  Respond to of 793717
 
Karen, do I know of any tests which might be affected by race? Off hand, no I do not. My input is strictly anecdotal, and I really don't know all that much for sure,
for certain. <g>

I heartily concur that taking a medical history to include family and social history is most relevant. Many physicians (but not enough) inquire as to prior and present travel history and environmental exposures, beyond smoking, alcohol and illicit drugs, and such information can provide definitive, albeit obscure, diagnoses.

As an aside, from the trivia department, I do know that multiple, small calcifications are seen on chest x-rays of most people who have lived in the Midwest for any length of time and are considered normal variants. I'll think some more on this and probably come up with some others. - Holly



To: Lane3 who wrote (96967)1/26/2005 12:15:13 PM
From: Ilaine  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793717
 
Apparently it is normal for blacks to have a 10-15% lower score on some pulmonary function tests. By "blacks" they appear to mean African-Americans. They excluded Pakistanis and Indians from the testing.