Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Anthony @ Equity Investigations, Dear Anthony, -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Pluvia who wrote (90104)	1/26/2005 3:15:02 PM
From: scion	Respond to of 122087

It seems he has 'elastic' principles - that must be very useful...

To: Pluvia who wrote (90104)	1/26/2005 3:34:59 PM
From: olivier asser	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 122087

2. then it appears, he's a willing participant in a fraudulent scheme in a chatroom That's a very risky statement for you to make, Stevie. If that were true, then I am quite sure that my litigation adversaries would have made that accusation without any hesitation in a federal court, for I have sued: 1. Philip R. Berber 2. Leslie M. Moor 3. Christopher J. Rea 4. Trading Places, Inc. for racketeering violations in Texas federal court, allegations not entirely unlike those that earned AP and friends multiple criminal convictions on Monday. My litigation is ongoing as we speak. Now, if it turns out you're making these posts in conspiracy with 1-4 above, who have never had the courage the past several years of litigation to make a single public statement to contradict any of my allegations in their own name rather than through aliases here at SI, then you'll have some problems, and it won't be the public perception you're leaving here with a refusal to answer direct questions, and libelous and defamatory accusations that are not founded in fact. For example, who do you think is the reason that Gretchen Morgenson published that article, without whom there would have been no article? Who contacted her in early July, 2000? Who traveled to Manhattan and met with her in person in August, 2000? Who sent her evidence? That's right, I did. And now I'm suing Berber, Moor, Rea and Trading Places - and no one else - for racketeering. In a court, mind you, not a message board, no defendant has ever accused me of fraud. Why? Because if they did, during ongoing litigation, then they would have to show facts to support that allegation. If they could not, then they wouldn't be subject to harsh posts on a board, but severe financial sanctions and possibly a contempt citation for filing false statements in a federal court. Skibum was a proprietary name for Trading Places analysts, half a dozen of them. Just like "DT" was the lead analysts for Day Traders Online. Just like Goldman Sachs issues upgrades and downgrades in the name Goldman Sachs. Using your logic: If Goldman Sachs issues an upgrade or downgrade recommendation, and fails to disclose that it has changed its team of analysts, replaced one or all of its team of analysts, without going on CNBC and telling the public all about its hiring and firing of analysts, then Goldman Sachs must be "a willing participant in a fraudulent scheme." OK, amigo.