Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Anthony @ Equity Investigations, Dear Anthony, -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Dave O. who wrote (90110)	1/26/2005 3:29:31 PM
From: Done, gone.	Respond to of 122087

...or Pluvia, since there is supposedly more than one, according to one of the Pluvias.

To: Dave O. who wrote (90110)	1/26/2005 3:36:50 PM
From: Pluvia	Respond to of 122087

seems like a clear cut case a fraud to me. and conspiracy to commit fraud. wonder why oli won't tell us what "really" happened? >>< Under no circumstances will you allow anyone at Trading Places know the `real identity' of the nickname `skibum. This is to protect the integrity and high regard many traders have for this nickname." > It would seem that would be misrepresentation, posing as someone you're not. Is that any different than if I, or anyone else, posed as say Rick Sherlund, the Goldman Sachs software analyst? Or posing as Jim Cramer? Or any analyst, stock picker, etc.

To: Dave O. who wrote (90110)	1/26/2005 3:58:13 PM
From: olivier asser	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 122087

By the way, I provided that contract to Gretchen Morgenson myself. Now why would I do that? Why would I contact her, not the other way around, to bring out that story? Are these the acts of anyone who has anything to hide? You're using an article that would not have been published except for my asking that Gretchen and the New York Times publish it. Strange tactics. If an analyst at Goldman Sachs publishes an analysis report under the heading Goldman, Sachs, and they're birthname is not Mr. Goldman or Mr. Sachs, though the public knows others make securities recommendations under the GSCO banner, are those analysts misrepresenting who they are? Does it make any difference to the public? If the recommendation is good faith and produces profits in a lawful manner, without inside information but honest research into the market? Why don't you ask me if I ever traded while making paid securities recommendations? 99% of trading industry analysts did; I did not, not ever, and my brokers would be able to and will be called to prove that in court in due course. I've asked Pluvia I don't know how many times if he not only traded his calls but front ran and traded against them. he refuses to answer. It seems to me that there is one group of posters here who are scared witless of answering any fair question. Instead, as before go into sheeple attack mode. Nothing new there.