Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Oeconomicus who wrote (94873)	1/27/2005 1:18:48 AM
From: cosmicforce	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 108807

<And isn't the Wash Times the paper lefties loved to dismiss during the election?> Not sure what that has to do with it. This is one of those wait and sees. Bush already said that he would be "disappointed" if the Iraqis elected themselves a theocracy, but he didn't say he'd veto such a plebiscite. Yes, maybe by some definitions, they are already in civil war, but that is going to be hard to tell until the big guns leave. I don't see how you can possibly think that a draft is out of the question. IF the Bush administration decides to go after Syria and Iran (and then North Korea starts pulling some shenanigans), I think we could then see China make a move on Taiwan. Bush has already said there would be limits to how far we’d go to support Taiwan. We are simply spread too thin and our forces are too poorly trained to enter into yet another theatre.