Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Anthony @ Equity Investigations, Dear Anthony, -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Pluvia who wrote (90123)	1/26/2005 3:56:55 PM
From: Dale Baker	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 122087

Why don't you play Jeopardy and give your answers in the form of a question? ;<)

To: Pluvia who wrote (90123)	1/26/2005 4:10:58 PM
From: olivier asser	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 122087

All appearances here indicate that you wouldn't know a quid pro quo even if your roommates were Socrates, Aristotle and Homer. You asked for three admissions, yes/no. I answered. Then you follow up with a barrage of interrogatories, both your own and the sheeples, as fast as they could let fly. Then you publish some seriously unwise and false conclusions. Meanwhile, you've had now close to a full 24 hours to prepare a simple yes or no to three easy questions, but we're still waitiing (does the bold help any?)... 1. Did you ever trade for your own or a proprietary account a securities recommendation you made in affiliation or association with Anthony Elgindy, a.k.a. Anthony@Pacific, Tony, AP, Anthony? 2. Did you ever execute a securities transaction before a recommendation in that security was issued publicly to InsideTruth.com and/or Silicon Investor members? 3. Did you ever cover a short position, i.e. purchase to return a borrowed security, while recommending to InsideTruth.com or SI members to short-sell the same security, in other words, did you ever recommend to InsideTruth.com or SI members that they should take a position in a security directly opposite to your own?