SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Ilaine who wrote (97034)1/26/2005 4:38:34 PM
From: neolib  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793718
 
In other words, there is a lower federal standard for pulmonary function tests for blacks who work around cotton dust than for whites.

Mighty convenient if you happen to be in the cotton business! Especially in the Deep South! Just hire blacks and you won't have to keep the workplace as clean as you do for whites.


What? You need a math refresher!



To: Ilaine who wrote (97034)1/26/2005 4:40:51 PM
From: Lane3  Respond to of 793718
 
Fascinating. Good get.



To: Ilaine who wrote (97034)1/26/2005 4:45:49 PM
From: neolib  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 793718
 
My apologies, I had only read this part: OSHA decreed that the standard for exposure to cotton dust should be multiplied by .85% for blacks!

This would imply blacks would need cleaner conditions. From the rest of what you posted, it is still not clear what is being adjusted down (0.85 is down, not up).



To: Ilaine who wrote (97034)1/26/2005 4:54:51 PM
From: DMaA  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793718
 
Scientific studies in peer review journals have confirmed these pulmonary function variable differences. It's not controversial.