Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lazarus_Long who wrote (94901)	1/26/2005 5:41:23 PM
From: one_less	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 108807

One of the things I have tried to help grainne with is the concept of what is 'right' for animals in the context of animal rights. It must be contextually defined within the natural endeavor of each species. That is the right circumstance in the biosphere that supports the well being of the species, and then be supportable by human beings. She saw that as an attack on affectionate sea lions ... ding dong ... anybody home? very slic

To: Lazarus_Long who wrote (94901)	1/26/2005 6:30:31 PM
From: Grainne	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 108807

I have nothing to say to you, Laz. You have again taken something that was an innocent discussion, dissected my posts to fit your own agenda, sort of splayed them out, parsed them, misrepresented what I said myself and what I was quoting from other sources, did not acknowledge that I myself clarified in a later post that there were some examples of cannibalism in animals but that only humans practiced RITUALISTIC cannibalism, etc. This kind of communication is deceitful on your part, and certainly does not require my participation. But I will object when you distort my posts, and the Feelies terms of use prohibit personal attacks and character assassination, and you also will be quickly rebanned unless you change your tune. Is that quite clear?