Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: one_less who wrote (94906)	1/26/2005 5:39:23 PM
From: epicure	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 108807

You may have imagined I was part of that conversation, but actually, had you read my post, you would have seen I was talking only about the US support of Pol Pot (in response to a post that completely denied any US support.) So no need to be sorry that I couldn't follow the conversation. When I saw something blatantly untrue, I thought I would correct it, and if you had read my post, you would have realized that was all it was about. I am sorry you could not or did not read my post.

To: one_less who wrote (94906)	1/26/2005 5:52:51 PM
From: Grainne	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 108807

Ionesco was not even hanging out here when we were discussing CIA involvement in the rise of Saddam Hussein, etc. She just happened upon Buschman's post asserting that Pol Pot was not backed by the U.S., and remarked on that part of the issue. You need to just leave Ionesco alone, obviously. You cannot continue to insinuate untrue things about her--that is a personal attack, which is against the Feelies thread rules. You seem to be just totally clueless about how to stay out of trouble here. If you want me to ban you, just tell me and I will. If you want to stay here, you will have to start behaving yourself.