SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Investment Chat Board Lawsuits -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Pluvia who wrote (7058)1/27/2005 6:47:21 AM
From: Dale Baker  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 12465
 
This strikes me as a crucial issue for the jury - they must not have believed Elgindy at all when his lawyers claimed he didn't know it was wrong for Royer to give him the classified info.

d. that ELGINDY knew that ROYER had breached his duty by disclosing the information;

Of course, since Royer basically said he had the right to violate FBI rules on giving out information, the jury could have inferred that Royer's defiance was shared with Elgindy, who must have known the information actually came from a "trust and confidence".

Or they simply agreed with everyone else that Tony was a chronic liar.

One layman's guess.



To: Pluvia who wrote (7058)1/27/2005 6:59:00 PM
From: Janice Shell  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 12465
 
d. that ELGINDY knew that ROYER had breached his duty by disclosing the information; and

How could it ever be proved that he did or didn't know?


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News