Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Investment Chat Board Lawsuits -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Pluvia who wrote (7061)	1/27/2005 7:06:05 AM
From: Dale Baker	Respond to of 12465

After ten weeks of testimony, the jury must have formed strong personal impressions of the defendants, even though Elgindy didn't testify directly. The expressions, reactions, body language, etc. all tell a story. If you, as a juror, believed these two guys were cocky liars who were certainly up to SOMETHING bad - i.e. that was your gut impression - it wasn't hard to connect the dots just like the prosecutor did and assume it was all done for nefarious purposes. When the prosecutor used the Batman analogy in his closing, I figured Elgindy's goose was cooked. Only kids believe in superheroes; the grownups on the jury know it's a story concocted to amaze and entertain the gullible, nothing more. JMHO.