SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Grainne who wrote (94984)1/27/2005 4:21:58 PM
From: Lazarus_Long  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 108807
 
I fear it appears you have been spreading a lie.

Remember your "They want to be banned" justification for not unbanning everyone? I PMed the people (besides Jewel) that you have in your ban list. Well, so far, 3 out of the 4 bannees NEVER TOLD YOU THEY WANTED TO REMAIN BANNED! I have yet to hear from the fourth. It could be unanimous.

So do you read minds? If not, how do you know they wanted to remain banned? Because they they didn't beg to be unbanned? How does you know they even knew of your "amnesty"? I found out only indirectly. You never PMed me or posted to me.

The fact that they did NOT specifically ask you to be unbanned is HARDLY the same as saying they wanted to remain banned.

Do you even KNOW what "truth" is?



To: Grainne who wrote (94984)1/27/2005 4:29:23 PM
From: Lazarus_Long  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 108807
 
And I just heard from the 4th. Same answer as the others. You lie like a rug. Good day, madam (if I may sully that word in using it to refer to you). Your honor and integrity do not exist. You may ban me or not, as you wish. I shall not be back. I refuse to deal with such as you.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News