SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Anthony @ Equity Investigations, Dear Anthony, -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Janice Shell who wrote (90237)1/27/2005 4:09:52 PM
From: olivier asser  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 122087
 
LOL! I guess that's why the Wall Street Journal and New York Times covered the trial daily for months. Why the New York Times, La Times, etc. all published prominent, lengthy articles about the results - because it only interested message board posters.

"This was a high profile case."

Not really. I think it was chiefly of interest to people who "knew" Tony on the message boards.



To: Janice Shell who wrote (90237)1/27/2005 4:11:00 PM
From: olivier asser  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 122087
 
By the way, "counsel," did you advise Pluvia to promise to answer my questions after I answered his, and then all day go back on his word here in public? If so, bad form indeed, dear lady.

I see Bear Down (new Mama Bear incarnation?) isn't answering either. What a surprise.



To: Janice Shell who wrote (90237)1/27/2005 11:04:10 PM
From: rrufff  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 122087
 
Disagree - it was high profile given the FBI involvement and the story that was involved. It wasn't OJ, but it was bigger than your typical white collar crime case.

I think it was chiefly of interest to people who "knew" Tony on the message boards.