Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Anthony @ Equity Investigations, Dear Anthony, -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Janice Shell who wrote (90302)	1/27/2005 11:38:21 PM
From: olivier asser	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 122087

Two wrongs make a right? So if Tony and Enterprise friends are targeting scams, the laws are suspended, blanket immunity granted for illegal conduct, they may become scams themselves? There's an ancient Latin proverb that addresses this proposition: Nemo auditur suam propriam turpitudinem allegans. "He who alleges his own turpitude is never heard." By the way, the Doctrine of Nemo Auditur has been upheld and affirmed by the United States Supreme Court: "No man may take advantage of his own wrong. Deeply rooted in our jurisprudence this principle has been applied in many diverse classes of cases by both law and equity courts." Glus v. Brooklyn Eastern District Terminal, 359 U.S. 231, 232-33, 3 L. Ed. 2d 770, 79 S. Ct. 760 (1959). Not least, it seems that a jury understood the concept very well also, never wise to underestimate the perception and wisdom of a jury now is it. Nice try though. Who actually suffered serious losses, except the people who failed to understand that the companies Tony went after really WERE scams?

To: Janice Shell who wrote (90302)	1/27/2005 11:38:34 PM
From: rrufff	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 122087

Are you serious? You are condoning extortion, pilfering FBI data and taking the law into your own hands????? If a tout did this, you'd be all over him with a multiplicity of posts. More importantly, the markets and the credibility of the markets suffer. Why should one group of traders have unfair advantage in the market? Is that what you want to be on record for advocating? Who's going to decide what is a scam? you? or a jury? Who actually suffered serious losses, except the people who failed to understand that the companies Tony went after really WERE scams?

To: Janice Shell who wrote (90302)	1/28/2005 12:01:07 AM
From: Yahoot	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 122087

It's interesting to watch you put a positive spin on this situation, as long as the person is/was part of the family. I remember reading about a convicted felon by the name of Andy Mann and if I remember, you were close pals, and after his conviction you were still doing the positive spin on him. On the other hand, if it was a target such as, Mr. Brown from I belive it was NSOL(?), you and your pals were spitting on his grave long after his death...something about his degrees amoung other things.