SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sioux Nation -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Wharf Rat who wrote (5844)1/28/2005 11:37:35 AM
From: Wharf Rat  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 362296
 


The Bull Market is Dead!
Long Live the Bull Market!

M.A. Nystrom, M.B.A.
Man on the street in (the Republic of) China
January 28, 2005

1. The bull market is over

In the event that you weren't aware of it, missed it, didn't see it, don't remember it or are consciously ignoring it, the bull market in U.S. common stocks is dead. Over. Kaput.

Five years after the turn of the millennium, Y2K still stands in the annals of history as the point that all three major U.S. indices - Dow, SPX and Nasdaq - hit their highs and then turned tail, marking the official beginning of the end of the Bull. Quickly came a dark and ugly period of crumbling and decay, with day after day of miserable market declines, right on through 9/11. It was not until almost a year later, in Fall of 2002 before the markets finally found support.

In just two short years, the entire world was turned upside down. Like being awakened from a pleasant slumber by a crack on the jaw, a bullish world of peace, prosperity and optimism was suddenly transformed into a bearish world of fear, uncertainty and war. The damage to retirement funds and stock portfolios was so bad that people were afraid to open their statements, afraid to be faced with the reality that their dreams of summer villas, new cars and most of all early retirements had evaporated with the mirage of prosperity.

Since those shocking lows in October 2002, the world seems to have returned to a certain sense of normalcy for most people, albeit a different, numb kind of normal. Once again we have to work for a living. No more day trading, CNBC, or retiring on stock options. And if the stock market has failed to register the 20% + annual gains of the last few years of the twentieth century, it has also managed to avert more of the surprising declines that characterized the opening of the twenty first. War is a reality. Thankfully, there have been no more terrorist attacks at home, and we've all gotten used to ignoring the false terror alarms put out by the new Ministry of Homeland Security. Likewise, we've gotten used to being searched, prodded and poked when we travel by air, though we grumble under our breaths at the inconvenience of it all (but only under our breaths - this is a different America). Even the market managed to score some decent gains again. The start of the war in Iraq in spring of 2003 marked the end of the declines, at least temporarily. The Dow regained most of its former glory (91% of it), and is still hanging in above 10,000. And if the SPX and NASDAQ did not do quite as well in absolute terms, they did manage spectacular rallies from their all time lows that would make any bull proud (see Table).

Table - Post Bubble Market Performance
All Time High Low to Date Decline Rally
Index Date Level Date Level Points % Fall Level Points Gained % Rise from Low % Retracement of All Time High
DOW 1/14/00 11,908 10/10/02 7,177 (4,731) (39%) 10,892 3,715 52% 91%
SPX 3/24/00 1,553 10/10/02 768 (785) (50%) 1,217 449 58% 78%
NASDAQ 3/10/00 5,132 10/10/02 1,108 (4,024) (78%) 2,191 1083 98% 42%

All of this is enough to lull the average investor back into a sense of complacency and lazy slumber, to begin once again dreaming of early retirement financed by stock market riches and housing equity gains. But those investors with a little knowledge of history, Elliott wave theory and the signature patterns of market manias are less sanguine. The wise readers among you realize that the gains from the panic lows are nothing more than an impressive, multi-year, dead-cat bounce.

Indeed, we can say this with authority, for in spite of the impressive gains of late, not one of the three indices has managed to crack a new high and are in fact now turning back down with a certain urgency not seen in the markets for several years. It was bound to happen. The recent, multiyear rallies in the markets have taken place against the backdrop of a deteriorating fundamental environment. More jobs have been lost, interest rates are on the rise, and personal, business and government debt loads are all soaring. The housing bubble hasn't skipped a beat, picking up right where the stock bubble left off. The dead-cat bounce was purely a technical rebound, a phenomenon common in all sharp market drops. If you've still got money in this market, now would be a good time to quietly head for the exit. . .before anyone else notices.

After nearly 3 years of market gains, 2005 will mark the turning point, with stocks likely resuming on the uncompleted downward spiral that began in Y2K. If you've made some profits, or have managed to recoup some losses in the last few years, it is time to take the money and run. Mark my words: The bull market is over!

2. Long live the bull market!

While the truth is plain enough to see with an objective set of eyes, very few investors with money at risk are blessed with such objective vision. Their sight remains clouded by the hopes and dreams that the bull market represents. The latest Investors Intelligence survey shows bullish sentiment among investment advisors at an ALL TIME HIGH, above even the heights reached at the Y2K peaks. The bull market is an emotional phenomenon that represents more than just rising stock prices - it is the embodiment of hope and optimism itself. As long as the bull market remains alive in the mind of the investor, there remains the possibility of that new sports car, the house with the ocean view, of early retirement, and telling the boss to take the job and shove it! If the bull market has died in the price of shares, it will continue to live on in the minds of guileless investors who continue to buy and hold, down the slippery slope-of-hope, to the end of the line where shares are worthless and dreams are demolished.

But it doesn't have to be this way. There is alwyas a bull market is something, somewhere. Opportunity abounds for the ambitious, the flexible, the nimble and the just plain smart, and it most certainly doesn't have to be in the US stock market. It is common knowledge that more millionaires were made during the Great Depression than during all of the roaring 20's in the United States, and the same will be true during the great period of transition we are living through today. But part of this transition means that the center of wealth is shifting inexorably away from the U.S. After all, the tallest building in the world was made in Taiwan! And take a look at Pudong (ever heard of Pudong?), a gleaming new metropolis and industrial park in Shanghai that sprang up in just under 10 years, like a field of mushrooms after a spring rain, fertilized by the hundreds of billions of dollars that US consumers send to China each year.



3. Turn and face the strange changes

A friend and colleague of mine who is a professor of Venture Capital and Entrepreneurship at National Chiao Tung University here in Taiwan emphasizes over and over to his graduate students that big changes create big opportunities. From his perspective, the dot.com boom and bust was necessary, and served its purpose; 10 years after the debut of Windows 95, the world is a different place thanks to new information communications technologies (ICT) that have emerged. They were invented during the boom; now their full potential is finally being put to use around the world. While only a small number of the bubble-era companies survived the bust, the outlines of the colossal changes that they are creating can already be seen taking shape.

As Americans, we tend to think that we are at the center of the universe and always will be, and the insular, corporate controlled media does nothing to dissuade this idea. But the world is a big place, and big changes are in the air. Just take one whiff of the howling winds, and I dare say that you can smell the changes, rolling in like a storm. You may be able to ignore them for a little while longer, but nothing can stop them. While the Corporate press keeps the American public entertained with politics and war, it smugly pooh-poohs China's growth as a bubble. But the optimism that hangs in the Asian air is as palpable as the pollution that clouds its skies. Shanghai is a city on the move and people in the daily course of their lives walk so fast down the streets of the city that they are running! America may still be the best place for ideas, but Asia has emerged as the best place to finance, produce and realize them.

As an American living in China for the past year (to be specific, the Republic of China on Taiwan), the world is starting to look a little different to me. There is no doubt that America is an empire and it still exercises its economic and cultural might (more on this in the future). But in China, a baby giant has been born, and he is hungry and he is growing. There is a new game in town, and it is played by international rules. Open your eyes - the bull market is dead! Come learn the new game or risk being left behind. Change creates opportunity. Long live the bull market!

© 2005 bullnotbull.com



bullnotbull.com



To: Wharf Rat who wrote (5844)1/28/2005 11:38:51 AM
From: SiouxPal  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 362296
 
Good post. Biden said 4,000 trained Iraqi forces, not 14,000.

Sioux-on-caffeine



To: Wharf Rat who wrote (5844)1/28/2005 12:22:39 PM
From: Ron  Respond to of 362296
 
Third columnist caught with hand in the Bush till
Michael McManus, conservative author of the syndicated column "Ethics & Religion," received $10,000 to promote a marriage initiative.
- - - - - - - - - - - -
By Eric Boehlert
Jan. 27, 2005 | And three makes a trend.
One day after President Bush ordered his Cabinet secretaries to stop hiring commentators to help promote administration initiatives, and one day after the second high-profile conservative pundit was found to be on the federal payroll, a third embarrassing hire has emerged. Salon has confirmed that Michael McManus, a marriage advocate whose syndicated column, "Ethics & Religion," appears in 50 newspapers, was hired as a subcontractor by the Department of Health and Human Services to foster a Bush-approved marriage initiative. McManus championed the plan in his columns without disclosing to readers he was being paid to help it succeed.

Responding to the latest revelation, Dr. Wade Horn, assistant secretary for children and families at HHS, announced Thursday that HHS would institute a new policy that forbids the agency from hiring any outside expert or consultant who has any working affiliation with the media. "I needed to draw this bright line," Horn tells Salon. "The policy is being implemented and we're moving forward."

Horn's move came on the heels of Wednesday's report in the Washington Post that HHS had paid syndicated columnist and marriage advocate Maggie Gallagher $21,000 to write brochures and essays and to brief government employees on the president's marriage initiative. Gallagher later wrote in her column that she would have revealed the $21,000 payment to readers had she recalled receiving it.

The Gallagher revelation came just three weeks after USA Today reported that the Education Department, through a contract with the Ketchum public relations firm, paid $240,000 to Armstrong Williams, a conservative African-American print, radio and television pundit, to help promote Bush's No Child Left Behind program to minority audiences.

To date, the Bush administration has paid public relation firms $250 million to help push proposals, according to a report Thursday in USA Today. That's double what the Clinton administration spent on P.R. from 1997 to 2000. Shortly after Williams' contract came to light, the Democrats on the Committee on Government Reform wrote a letter to President Bush demanding that he "immediately provide to us all past and ongoing efforts to engage in covert propaganda, whether through contracts with commentators, the distribution of video news releases, or other means." As of Thursday, a staffer on the committee told Salon, there had been no response.

Horn says McManus, who could not be reached for comment, was paid approximately $10,000 for his work as a subcontractor to the Lewin Group, a health care consultancy hired by HHS to implement the Community Healthy Marriage Initiative, which encourages communities to combat divorce through education and counseling. McManus provided training during two-day conferences in Chattanooga, Tenn., and also made presentations at HHS-sponsored conferences. His syndicated column has appeared in such papers as the Washington Times, the Dallas Morning News and the Charlotte Observer.

Horn, who has known McManus for years, says he first learned about the payment on Thursday. In the wake of the Gallagher story, he asked his staff to review all outside contracts and determine if there were any other columnists being paid by HHS. They informed him about McManus. Horn says the review for similar contracts continues.

Horn insists that HHS was not paying Gallagher and McManus to write about Bush administration initiatives but for their expertise as marriage advocates. "We live in a complicated world and people wear many different hats," he says. "People who have expertise might also be writing columns. The line has become increasingly blurred between who's a member of the media and who is not. Thirty years ago if you were a columnist, then you were a full-time employee of a newspaper. Columnists today are different."

The problem springs from the failure of both Gallagher and McManus to disclose their government payments when writing about the Bush proposals. But one HHS critic says another dynamic has led to the controversy, and a blurring of ethical and journalistic lines: Horn and HHS are hiring advocates -- not scholars -- from the pro-marriage movement. "They're ideological sympathizers who propagandize," says Tim Casey, attorney for Legal Momentum, a women's rights organization. He describes McManus as being a member of the "extreme religious right."

Horn denies the charge: "It's not true that we have just been selectively working with conservatives." According to news accounts, the administration seeks to spend $1.5 billion promoting marriage through marriage-enrichment courses, counseling and public-awareness campaigns.

In 1996, McManus co-founded Marriage Savers, a conservative advocacy group, which, among other things, urges clergy not to conduct a marriage ceremony unless the couple has had lengthy counseling first. "The church should not be a 'wedding factory,' but a training ground for strong marriages to go the distance -- for life," McManus wrote.

In his April 3, 2004, column, McManus wrote, "The Healthy Marriage Initiative would provide funds to help those couples improve their skills of conflict resolution so they might actually marry -- and be equipped to build a healthy marriage. Those skills can be taught by mentor couples in churches for free. But for the non-religious, counselors would be paid."

A year earlier, McManus assured readers that funds provided for the Healthy Marriage Initiative "could be used to teach skills to improve communication and resolve conflict that would make the relationship happier and lead to a healthy marriage." He based that assessment on comments made by HHS's Horn, who, indirectly, served as McManus' boss -- although that relationship was never revealed to readers.

- - - - - - - - - - - -
salon.com