Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Anthony @ Equity Investigations, Dear Anthony, -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Man on the moon who wrote (90430)	1/28/2005 4:10:48 PM
From: olivier asser	Respond to of 122087

None, as long as your trade position is consistent with what you say, nothing wrong with making a prediction if you don't have a hidden agenda. I said SKYM would got to 50; it did. Tony said it would end up coming back down; it did. In that respect, we were both right in the end in our predictions, only Tony spent a very uncomfortable first day averaging his position up 300%. please tell me the difference between saying: short) This is a POS and we open at a buck tomorrow long) this stock is primed we will see 40 tomorrow First it has to be ordered to trial, orders are pending on dismissal motions. At that point, I'll be speaking again with a number of law firms to come on board to support this case. I wonder how I "bumbled" my way into a position as lead analyst at Trading Places? Again, I'm looking forward to any possible explanation why a "loser" would be hired as a lead securities analyst at one of the top three investment adviser sites on the Internet. I'm also looking forward to explanations of sworn statements claiming the kickback arrangements did not exist, when I prove that they did. If they come to court saying the kickbacks were perfectly acceptable, then how to explain the previous denials? Finally, we'll see, but if I were a "bumbling fool," maybe Berber, Moor, Rea and Trading Places would have simply answered these racketeering allegations, and let the chips fall where they may, rather than seek to avoid a trial on the merits for now going on three years. Why do I have this funny feeling that when your case hits trial, the defense will reveal that you are quite the bumbling fool. too funny.