To: Man on the moon who wrote (90442 ) 1/28/2005 4:50:31 PM From: olivier asser Read Replies (1) | Respond to Obviously, your question is in fact an answer, and that's that there were really no calls at TP, it was just a moderated discussion, as Rea claimed under penalty of perjury in the San Francisco Superior Court. Problem for him, I recorded a number of logs before he destroyed the record (obstruction of justice and discovery misconduct, by the way, which if proved may lead to sanctions in the form of default judgment without trial, just take a look at what happened to Andersen Consulting for destroying evidence during legal proceedings). I also was an analyst at TP. he may call Chris Curran, John Jordan, William Young to testify that there were no recommendations. I'll compel them to swear under oath to statements of that nature. If that happens, I have plenty of evidence to impeach those claims, and then those witnesses would be at risk of sanctions, and so would defense counsel, for introducing perjured testimony into the record. Not quite bumbling; I've put to good use the past few years of deliberate delay the defendants caused. Wiser for them would have been going to trial before I learned anything. But, they hoped I would simply quit, given enough time, but I've learned to be patient, where they're concerned.
