Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: epicure who wrote (95303)	1/30/2005 9:19:14 PM
From: Brumar89	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 108807

What was that stuff about ..they were very careful not to kill anyone. The movie goes in to some detail about how carefully they planned their bombings so as not to kill anyone. Message 20999328 In that post and the one below, you were clearly writing as an apologist in defense of their reputation. One of their members did go on to join another radical organization, and participated in a bank robbery where someone was killed- and he is serving 99 years, but the WU were not responsible for the robbery, and had no connection to it. http://www.siliconinvestor.com/readmsg.aspx?msgid=20999383 Typical of you to deflect the issue into whether you used a particular word. If I'd worded it as "being an apologist" for them, would it matter?